Predictors and outcomes of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Singapore: a multicentre observational study

Clare Fong,Wern Lunn Kueh,Sennen Jin Wen Lew,Benjamin Choon Heng Ho,Yu-Lin Wong,Yie Hui Lau,Yew Woon Chia,Hui Ling Tan,Ying Hao Christopher Seet,Wen Ting Siow,Graeme MacLaren,Rohit Agrawal,Tian Jin Lim,Shir Lynn Lim,Toon Wei Lim,Vui Kian Ho,Chai Rick Soh,Duu Wen Sewa,Chian Min Loo,Faheem Ahmed Khan,Chee Keat Tan,Roshni Sadashiv Gokhale,Chuin Siau,Noelle Louise Siew Hua Lim,Chik-Foo Yim,Jonathen Venkatachalam,Kumaresh Venkatesan,Naville Chi Hock Chia,Mei Fong Liew,Guihong Li,Li Li,Su Mon Myat,Zena Zena,Shuling Zhuo,Ling Ling Yueh,Caroline Shu Fang Tan,Jing Ma,Siew Lian Yeo,Yiong Huak Chan,Jason Phua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00725-3
2024-03-27
Journal of Intensive Care
Abstract:Clinical practice guidelines on limitation of life-sustaining treatments (LST) in the intensive care unit (ICU), in the form of withholding or withdrawal of LST, state that there is no ethical difference between the two. Such statements are not uniformly accepted worldwide, and there are few studies on LST limitation in Asia. This study aimed to evaluate the predictors and outcomes of withholding and withdrawal of LST in Singapore, focusing on the similarities and differences between the two approaches.
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?