Abstract:Introduction Patients with mental illness experience a substantial inequity when facing cancer treatment compared to patients without mental illness. They have a higher cancer mortality and are less likely to be referred for treatment following clinical guidelines. The cancer treatment can exacerbate mental symptoms, which may lead to discontinuation of the treatment. Other relevant specialities such as psychiatry and general practice are rarely involved. Objectives In this qualitative case study, the needs, barriers and facilitators of providing high quality, patient-centered care to patients with cancer and pre-existing mental illness were explored. Emphasis was on patients' experiences of being in the field between oncology, psychiatry, general practice and the municipality. Methods The study was anchored at the Department of Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle and data collection took place from January to June 2023. Through purposeful sampling five patients with cancer from adult psychiatric setting were included. Field studies were carried out inspired by the framework of Spradley, and involved following the patients during visits to the department of oncology and in the psychiatric setting. Formal interviews were performed using semi-structured interview guides inspired by Kvale and Brinkmann. Patient files were examined focusing on the awareness of the psychiatric diagnosis and treatment and communication between the departments and sectors. Results Our analysis showed one major theme: "Complexity on many levels", and five subthemes: "The impact of the cancer trajectory on mental illness", "The structure follows the disease, not the patient", "Fragmentation of the health care system", "Patient vulnerability" and "Importance of the patient-professional-relationship". Barriers included lack of a systematic approach to the patient group in the health care system and sparse collaboration between departments and sectors. The cancer trajectory often led to severe worsening of the psychiatric illness, resulting in psychiatric hospitalisation. Facilitators were specialized coordinators at the hospital or municipality, relatives, patients' resources and health professionals approaching the patient as a person rather than a disease. Final results will be ready for presentation at the conference. Conclusions Despite intentions of reducing inequality, the Danish health care system is still not equipped to sufficiently help patients with cancer and pre-existing mental illness through their cancer treatment. This study will highlight relevant target points, paving the way for a new, feasible care model that improves continuity and patient-centered care for patients with cancer and mental illness. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

"We're the very bottom, so it's going to be hard for you to 'catch any fish' around here..." understanding vulnerable Greenlanders' perspectives on cancer and barriers to screening in Denmark– A qualitative study

Access to colorectal cancer screening for Pakistani immigrants in Norway - a qualitative study

Burden of selected chronic non-communicable diseases in a primary healthcare setting in Nuuk, Greenland, compared to a Danish suburb

Good cancer follow-up for socially disadvantaged patients in general practice? Perspectives from patients and general practitioners

Communicating without a Shared Language: A Qualitative Study of Language Barriers in Language-Discordant Cancer Communication

Barriers in access to dementia care in minority ethnic groups in Denmark: a qualitative study

Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening in Denmark – a qualitative study

Barriers in cancer care for patients with mental illness – a qualitative study

Non-participation in breast screening in Denmark: Sociodemographic determinants

Breast cancer-specific survival among immigrants and non-immigrants invited to BreastScreen Norway

Obstacles for patients with a low socio-economic status treated within the head and neck cancer pathway: A multiple case study

Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey

The Danish Health Survey among Marginalized People: Study design and respondent characteristics

Women's experiences with opting out of cervical cancer screening and the role of the nurse in the women's decision‐making process

Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012–2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women

How far is too far? Cancer prevention and clinical trial enrollment in geographically underserved patient populations

"It's cancer screening after all". Barriers to cervical and colorectal cancer screening and attitudes to promotion of self-sampling kits upon attendance for breast cancer screening

Regional cancer incidence and survival in Denmark

Do immigrants know less than natives about cancer screening tests? - the case of Netherlands

Exploring colorectal cancer patients' diagnostic pathways and general practitioners' assessment of the diagnostic processes: a Danish survey study

Barriers to Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Pilot Qualitative Study of Patient and Practitioner Perspectives in Rural India