Abstract:How robust is the natural genetic code with respect to mistranslation errors? It has long been known that the genetic code is very efficient in limiting the effect of point mutation. A misread codon will commonly code either for the same amino acid or for a similar one in terms of its biochemical properties, so the structure and function of the coded protein remain relatively unaltered. Previous studies have attempted to address this question more quantitatively, namely by statistically estimating the fraction of randomly generated codes that do better than the genetic code regarding its overall robustness. In this paper, we extend these results by investigating the role of amino acid frequencies in the optimality of the genetic code. When measuring the relative fitness of the natural code with respect to a random code, it is indeed natural to assume that a translation error affecting a frequent amino acid is less favorable than that of a rare one, at equal mutation cost. We find that taking the amino acid frequency into account accordingly decreases the fraction of random codes that beat the natural code, making the latter comparatively even more robust. This effect is particularly pronounced when more refined measures of the amino acid substitution cost are used than hydrophobicity. To show this, we devise a new cost function by evaluating with computer experiments the change in folding free energy caused by all possible single-site mutations in a set of known protein structures. With this cost function, we estimate that of the order of one random code out of 100 millions is more fit than the natural code when taking amino acid frequencies into account. The genetic code seems therefore structured so as to minimize the consequences of translation errors on the 3D structure and stability of proteins.

Accuracy of initial codon selection by aminoacyl-tRNAs on the mRNA-programmed bacterial ribosome

Hyperaccurate Ribosomes for Improved Genetic Code Reprogramming

Geometric alignment of aminoacyl-tRNA relative to catalytic centers of the ribosome underpins accurate mRNA decoding

Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy

The Yin and Yang of Trna: Proper Binding of Acceptor End Determines the Catalytic Balance of Editing and Aminoacylation

Two proofreading steps amplify the accuracy of genetic code translation

Deciphering the reading of the genetic code by near-cognate tRNA

Mistranslation of the genetic code by a new family of bacterial transfer RNAs

Structural analyses clarify the complex control of mistranslation by tRNA synthetases.

Optimality of the genetic code with respect to protein stability and amino acid frequencies

Codon-by-codon Modulation of Translational Speed and Accuracy Via Mrna Folding.

Mistranslating the genetic code with leucine in yeast and mammalian cells

Genetic Code-Guided Protein Synthesis and Folding in Escherichia Coli

Posttranscriptional modification to the core of tRNAs modulates translational misreading errors

Synonymous Codons: Choose Wisely for Expression

Generic Algorithm to Predict the Speed of Translational Elongation: Implications for Protein Biogenesis

Speeding with control: codon usage, tRNAs, and ribosomes

A tRNA modification pattern that facilitates interpretation of the genetic code

Measuring the tolerance of the genetic code to altered codon size

Balanced Codon Usage Optimizes Eukaryotic Translational Efficiency.

Orthogonality of Redesigned tRNA Molecules with Three Stop Codons