Memory of land surface and subsurface temperature (LST/SUBT) initial anomalies over Tibetan Plateau in different land models

Yuan Qiu,Jinming Feng,Jun Wang,Yongkang Xue,Zhongfeng Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05937-z
IF: 4.901
2021-08-25
Climate Dynamics
Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">This study applies three widely used land models (SSiB, CLM, and Noah-MP) coupled in a regional climate model to quantitatively assess their skill in preserving the imposed ± 5&nbsp;°C anomalies on the initial land surface and subsurface temperature (LST/SUBT) and generating the 2-m air temperature (T2m) anomalies over Tibetan Plateau (TP) during May–August. The memory of the LST/SUBT initial anomalies (surface/soil memory) is defined as the first time when time series of the differences in daily LST/SUBT cross the zero line during the simulation, with the unit of days. The memory of the T2m anomalies (T2m memory) is defined in the same way. The ensemble results indicate that the simulated soil memory generally increases with soil depth, which is consistent with the results based on the observations with statistic methods. And the soil memory is found to change rapidly with depth above ~ 0.6–0.7&nbsp;m and vary slowly below it. The land models have fairly long soil memories, with the regional mean 1.0-m soil memory generally longer than 60&nbsp;days. However, they have short T2m memory, with the regional means generally below 20&nbsp;days. This may bring a big challenge to use the LST/SUBT approach on the&nbsp;sub-seasonal to seasonal (S2S) prediction. Comparison between the three land models shows that CLM and Noah-MP have longer soil memory at the deeper layers (&gt; ~ 0.05&nbsp;m) while SSiB has longer T2m/surface memories and near-surface (<span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1.808ex" height="2.176ex" style="vertical-align: -0.505ex;" viewBox="0 -719.6 778.5 936.9" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-2264" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> ~ 0.05&nbsp;m) soil memory. As a result, it is difficult to say which land model is optimal for the application of the LST/SUBT approach on the S2S prediction. The T2m/surface/soil memories are various over TP, distinct among the land models, and different between the + 5&nbsp;°C and − 5&nbsp;°C experiment, which can be explained by both changes in the surface heat fluxes and variances in the hydrological processes over the plateau.</p><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-2264" d="M674 636Q682 636 688 630T694 615T687 601Q686 600 417 472L151 346L399 228Q687 92 691 87Q694 81 694 76Q694 58 676 56H670L382 192Q92 329 90 331Q83 336 83 348Q84 359 96 365Q104 369 382 500T665 634Q669 636 674 636ZM84 -118Q84 -108 99 -98H678Q694 -104 694 -118Q694 -130 679 -138H98Q84 -131 84 -118Z"></path></defs></svg>
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?