Abstract:Motivation Pricing decisions are often made when market information is still poor. While modern pricing analytics aid firms to infer the distribution of the stochastic demand that they are facing, data-driven price optimization methods are often impractical or incomplete if not coupled with testable theoretical predictions. In turn, existing theoretical models often reason about the response of optimal prices to changing market characteristics without exploiting all available information about the demand distribution. Academic/practical relevance Our aim is to develop a theory for the optimization and systematic comparison of prices between different instances of the same market under various forms of knowledge about the corresponding demand distributions. Methodology We revisit the classic problem of monopoly pricing under demand uncertainty in a vertical market with an upstream supplier and multiple forms of downstream competition between arbitrary symmetric retailers. In all cases, demand uncertainty falls to the supplier who acts first and sets a uniform price before the retailers observe the realized demand and place their orders. Results Our main methodological contribution is that we express the price elasticity of expected demand in terms of the mean residual demand (MRD) function of the demand distribution. This leads to a closed form characterization of the points of unitary elasticity that maximize the supplier’s profits and the derivation of a mild unimodality condition for the supplier’s objective function that generalizes the widely used increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR) condition. A direct implication is that optimal prices between different markets can be ordered if the markets can be stochastically ordered according to their MRD functions or equivalently, their elasticities. Using the above, we develop a systematic framework to compare optimal prices between different market instances via the rich theory of stochastic orders. This leads to comparative statics that challenge previously established economic insights about the effects of market size, demand transformations and demand variability on monopolistic prices. Managerial implications Our findings complement data-driven decisions regarding price optimization and provide a systematic framework useful for making theoretical predictions in advance of market movements.

Make‐or‐buy decisions in vertically differentiated input marketsty

Make or Buy in the Presence of Strategic Competition on Substitutable Products

Procurement of advanced inputs and welfare-reducing vertical integration

Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Upstream Suppliers

Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership

Optimal policy choice and asymmetric information in a mixed market

Privatization in mixed duopoly with vertical differentiation: Price versus quantity competition

Complementary inputs, outsourcing and vertical integration: Price versus quantity competition

Vertical Price Restraints and Free Entry Under Asymmetric Information

Backward Partial Vertical Integration Through Private Placement

Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market

Equilibrium vertical structure with a common supplier

Vertical Strategy with Quality Differentiation in an Import-competing Market

Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures

Upstream SOEs in the mixed-ownership reform

Monopoly pricing in vertical markets with demand uncertainty

Optimal trade, industrial, and privatization policies in a mixed duopoly with strategic managerial incentives

Price-Cap Regulation of Firms That Supply Their Rivals

Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly when a public firm supplies its private competitor

Price regulation, network externality, and product innovation strategies: A dynamic analysis

A game-theoretic analysis of the impact of government subsidy on optimal product greening and pricing decisions in a duopolistic market