Abstract:The study focus was the influx of youth as an effect of the new town development policy through relocation of public institutions. We also examined differences according to location type (large and medium/small cities). In addition, we classified the effects of the influx of youth into the Seoul Metropolitan Area (SMA), non-Seoul Metropolitan Area (non-SMA), the surrounding area (SA), and non-surrounding area (non-SA). We conducted the analysis using the propensity score matching and difference-in-differences (PSM-DID) model. Study findings indicated that the new town development policy through relocation of public institutions had a positive effect, fostering an influx of youth. However, the effects of the influx of youth differed by location type (i.e. large and medium/small cities). Specifically, the effects of the influx of youth from the SMA were positive for both location types, but the effects from the non-SMA were statistically significant only for medium/small cities. In addition, we found positive effects on the youth influx from both the SA and non-SA regions in medium/small cities. This study can help policymakers and planners consider location types when developing strategies to activate a youth influx through the relocation of public institutions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the impact of the public institution relocation policy on the inflow of youth, and it pays special attention to the differences between large cities and small and medium - sized cities. Specifically, the research mainly focuses on the following aspects:
1. **Analyzing the impact of the public institution relocation policy on the inflow of youth**: The research aims to explore how the public institution relocation policy (i.e., new city construction) affects the inflow of youth. This includes examining the impact of the relocation of public institutions from metropolitan areas (SMA) to non - metropolitan areas (non - SMA) and surrounding areas (SA) and non - surrounding areas (non - SA) on the inflow of youth.
2. **Distinguishing the impacts of different city types**: The research further analyzes the different effects of the public institution relocation policy in large cities and small and medium - sized cities. The research finds that there are significant differences in the effectiveness of large cities and small and medium - sized cities in attracting youth, especially in terms of the inflow of youth from SMA and non - SMA.
3. **Evaluating the effectiveness of the policy**: By using the propensity score matching and difference - in - differences (PSM - DID) model, the research evaluates the actual effectiveness of the public institution relocation policy. The results show that the public institution relocation policy has a positive impact on the inflow of youth, but this impact is different in different types of cities.
### Research Background
In recent years, the South Korean government has implemented a public institution relocation policy, aiming to promote local economic development and alleviate the problem of unbalanced regional development by relocating public institutions from metropolitan areas (such as the Seoul Capital Area) to local cities. However, there are relatively few studies on the specific impact of this policy on the inflow of youth, especially in terms of the differences between large cities and small and medium - sized cities.
### Research Methods
To evaluate the impact of the public institution relocation policy on the inflow of youth, the research adopts the following methods:
- **Data Sources**: The research uses the data of 162 local governments in South Korea from 2007 to 2020.
- **Model Selection**: The research adopts the propensity score matching and difference - in - differences (PSM - DID) model to analyze the policy effectiveness.
- **Variable Settings**: The research considers multiple influencing factors, including the employment environment, local finance, cultural facilities, social welfare, medical services, and educational environment.
### Main Findings
The main findings of the research are as follows:
- **Overall Effect**: The public institution relocation policy has a positive impact on the inflow of youth, especially more obvious in small and medium - sized cities.
- **Differences in City Types**: There are significant differences in the effectiveness of large cities and small and medium - sized cities in attracting youth. Specifically, the inflow of youth from SMA has a positive impact on both types of cities, while the inflow of non - SMA youth has a significant impact only on small and medium - sized cities.
- **Regional Differences**: The inflow of youth from SA and non - SA has a positive impact on small and medium - sized cities, while this impact is not obvious in large cities.
### Policy Recommendations
The research results provide valuable references for policymakers, especially when formulating policies to attract youth, the size and location of the city should be considered. Specific suggestions include:
- **Targeted Policies**: Formulate more targeted policies according to the different characteristics of large cities and small and medium - sized cities to better attract youth.
- **Infrastructure Construction**: Strengthen the infrastructure construction in small and medium - sized cities, especially the facilities related to employment, education, and culture, to increase the attractiveness to youth.
- **Regional Coordinated Development**: Promote the coordinated development between regions and reduce the excessive flow of the youth population from non - metropolitan areas to metropolitan areas.
Through these measures, the public institution relocation policy can be more effectively used to promote the development of the local economy and alleviate the problem of unbalanced regional development.