Efficacy of four internal fixation devices on femoral neck fractures in young adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Daotong Yuan,Zhimeng Zhang,Xu Wang,Wenjie Chang,Wenpeng Xie,Yongkui Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040265
IF: 1.6
2024-11-13
Medicine
Abstract:The femoral neck fracture occurs between the femoral head and the base of the femoral neck and is a common type of fracture, accounting for 3.6% of all fractures. [ 1 ] High-energy injury in young people ( 18 years old) is identified as the main cause of femoral neck fracture, and the incidence of complications is as high as 45%. [ 2 ] High-energy injury often results in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, characterized by high shear force and instability. [ 3 ] Treatment options for femoral neck fractures include internal fixation and joint replacement surgery, with internal fixation recommended for young adults to avoid the need for joint replacement revision. [ 4–6 ] Various internal fixation devices are used in surgical procedures for femoral neck fractures, but some may not provide sufficient mechanical support during the healing process due to the unique anatomical structure and blood supply of the proximal femur. [ 2 , 7 ] At present, prevalent internal fixation devices utilized in surgical procedures encompass various types such as multiple cannulated screws, femoral neck system (FNS), plate combined screws, dynamic hip screw (DHS), and DHS combined with a screw. Each of these internal fixation devices possesses distinct advantages and drawbacks. According to several meta-analyses, compared with inverted triangular cannulated screws (ITCS), other internal fixation devices only performed well in reoperation rate. [ 8 , 9 ] While numerous biomechanical studies have analyzed the mechanical variances among these devices, the potential impacts of vascular injury and fracture fragments have often been overlooked. [ 10 , 11 ]
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?