Abstract:Importance:Success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are modest for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Additional linear ablation beyond PVI has not been proved superior to PVI alone in randomized trials. Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) facilitates ablation at the mitral isthmus and may lead to improved effectiveness of a linear ablation strategy. Objective:To determine whether linear ablation with radiofrequency energy combined with EIVOM added to PVI improves sinus rhythm maintenance compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF. Design, Setting, and Participants:The PROMPT-AF trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving 12 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 498 patients aged 18 to 80 years, with AF persisting for more than 3 months, undergoing first-time AF ablation, were enrolled and randomized from August 27, 2021, to July 16, 2023. Interventions:Patients were randomized to undergo PVI alone or PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation (intervention). The latter group first underwent EIVOM, followed by PVI and linear ablation of the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus, and cavotricuspid isthmus. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 30 seconds, without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF, atrial arrhythmia recurrence after multiple procedures, and documented atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with or without antiarrhythmic drugs; AF burden; and improvement in quality of life. Patients were monitored with wearable single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) patches, worn for 24 hours a week, supplemented by symptom-triggered ECGs and Holter monitoring. Results:Among 498 randomized patients, 495 (99.4%) were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 61.1 years [SD, 9.7] years, 361 male [72.9%]). After 12 months, 174 of 246 patients (70.7%) assigned to undergo PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation and 153 of 249 patients (61.5%) assigned to undergo PVI alone remained free from atrial arrhythmias without taking antiarrhythmic drugs (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99, P = .045). The intervention effect was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The comparison of secondary outcomes did not demonstrate significant results. Conclusion:Among patients with persistent AF, linear ablation combined with EIVOM in addition to PVI significantly improved freedom from atrial arrhythmias within 12 months compared with PVI alone. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04497376.

Impact of inter-lesion distance and first-pass isolation on outcomes of pulmonary venous isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Optimized Linear Ablation Vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF

Intraprocedural Endpoints To Predict Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Randomized Trial Of Four Post-Ablation Techniques

Efficacy of Ablation Index-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Optimized Linear Ablation Vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF: the PROMPT-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Early detection of pulmonary vein reconnection after isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparison of ATP-induction and reassessment at 30 minutes postisolation.

Dissociated pulmonary vein rhythm may predict the acute pulmonary vein reconnection post-isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

GW26-e4813 Impact of Anatomically-guided Ganglionated Plexus Ablation on Electrical Firing from Isolated Pulmonary Veins

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Rationale and Study Design for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Guided by Ablation Index: a Multi-Center, Prospective Randomized Trial (PAF-AI Trial)

Sequential Versus Optimized Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: a Pilot Study

Contact-force local impedance algorithm to guide effective pulmonary vein isolation in AF patients: 1-year outcome from an international multicenter clinical setting

Impact of transseptal puncture location on the fossa ovalis on first-pass pulmonary vein isolation

Achievement of Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients Undergoing Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation: A Randomized Comparison Between Two Different Isolation Approaches

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Low-Voltage Area Modification in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Effect of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Left Atrial Wall Isolation Plus Selective CFAE Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Non-pulmonary vein foci induced before and after pulmonary vein isolation in patients undergoing ablation therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: incidence and clinical outcome

Greater distance between ablation lines reduces the recurrence rate after pulmonary vein isolation

Predictors of first pass isolation of the pulmonary veins in real world ablations: An analysis of 2671 patients from the REAL‐AF registry

Effect of identification and treatment of early pulmonary vein re-connection on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation

Is circumferential pulmonary vein isolation preferable to stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?