Abstract:Epilepsy Currents, Ahead of Print. Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: A Multicenter, Machine Learning, Prospective Validation StudyWissel BD, Greiner HM, Glauser TA, Pestian JP, Ficker DM, Cavitt JL, Estofan L, Holland-Bouley KD, Mangano FT, Szczesniak RD, Dexheimer JW. Neurology. 2024 Feb;102(4):e208048. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000208048. Epub 2024 Feb 5. PMID: 38315952Background and objectives: Epilepsy surgery is often delayed. We previously developed machine learning (ML) models to identify candidates for resective epilepsy surgery earlier in the disease course. In this study, we report the prospective validation. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study, random forest models were validated at a pediatric epilepsy center consisting of 2 hospitals and 14 outpatient neurology clinic sites and an adult epilepsy center with 2 hospitals and 27 outpatient neurology clinic sites. The models used neurology visit notes, EEG and MRI reports, visit patterns, hospitalizations, and medication, laboratory, and procedure orders to identify candidates for surgery. The models were trained on historical data up to May 10, 2019. Patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of epilepsy who visited from May 11, 2019, to May 10, 2020, were screened by the algorithm and assigned surgical candidacy scores. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC), which was calculated by comparing scores from patients who underwent epilepsy surgery before November 10, 2020, against scores from nonsurgical patients. Nonsurgical patients' charts were reviewed to determine whether patients with high scores were more likely to be missed surgical candidates. Delay to surgery was defined as the time between the first visit that a surgical candidate was identified by the algorithm and the date of the surgery. Results: A total of 5285 pediatric and 5782 adult patients were included to train the ML algorithms. During the study period, 41 children and 23 adults underwent resective epilepsy surgery. In the pediatric cohort, AUC was 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94), positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.08 (0.05-0.10), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 1.00 (0.99-1.00). In the adult cohort, AUC was 0.91 (0.86-0.97), PPV was 0.07 (0.04-0.11), and NPV was 1.00 (0.99-1.00). The models first identified patients at a median of 2.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.2-4.9 years, maximum: 11.1 years) before their surgery and 1.3 years (IQR: 0.3-4.0 years, maximum: 10.1 years) before their presurgical evaluations. Discussion: ML algorithms can identify surgical candidates earlier in the disease course. Even at specialized epilepsy centers, there is room to shorten the time to surgery. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that a machine learning algorithm can accurately distinguish patients with epilepsy who require resective surgery from those who do not.

Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting the Short-Term Outcome of Resective Surgery in Lesional-Drug Resistance Epilepsy

Machine learning algorithm for predicting seizure control after temporal lobe resection using peri-ictal electroencephalography

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Seizure Outcome After Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Machine learning models for predicting treatment response in infantile epilepsies

Machine Learning-Derived Multimodal Neuroimaging of Presurgical Target Area to Predict Individual's Seizure Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery

Prediction of antiepileptic drug treatment outcomes using machine learning

Predicting efficacy of antiseizure medication treatment with machine learning algorithms in North Indian population

Prediction of epilepsy surgery outcome using foramen ovale EEG - A machine learning approach

Flag on the Field: Identifying Epilepsy Surgery Candidates Using Machine Learning

Machine Learning for Localizing Epileptogenic-Zone in the Temporal Lobe: Quantifying the Value of Multimodal Clinical-Semiology and Imaging Concordance

A comprehensive study of machine learning-based methods to predict epileptic seizures

Machine learning for predicting levetiracetam treatment response in temporal lobe epilepsy

Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery

Prediction of Epilepsy Seizures by Machine Learning Methods

Prediction of post-stroke epilepsy using machine learning method

Prediction of antiepileptic drug treatment outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy by machine learning

Machine Learning for Predicting Epileptic Seizures Using EEG Signals: A Review

Predicting Surgical Outcome in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Using Autoregressive Connectivity and Virtual Resection

A Machine Learning-Based Online Prediction Tool for Predicting Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes Following Spinal Tumor Resections

Can machine learning predict late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhages? Evidence from real-world data

Using spectral and temporal filters with EEG signal to predict the temporal lobe epilepsy outcome after antiseizure medication via machine learning