Video versus audio telehealth in safety net clinic patients: Changes by rurality and time

Annie E. Larson,Kurt C. Stange,John Heintzman,Whitney E. Zahnd,Melinda M. Davis,S. Marie Harvey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12887
2024-10-03
The Journal of Rural Health
Abstract:Background Understanding the mix of video versus audio telehealth modality is critical to informing care for low‐income safety net clinic patients. Our study examined whether telehealth modality and continued use of telehealth varied by rurality and whether that changed over time. Methods Encounters from adults in the OCHIN national network of primary care safety net clinics were identified by encounter type (in‐person vs telehealth) and telehealth modality (video vs audio) from 4/1/2021 to 3/31/2023. Our main outcome was an interaction between patient rurality (defined using Rural Urban Commuting Area codes) and time. Linear probability models with clinic fixed effects were used to estimate predicted probabilities. Results The predicted probability of a telehealth visit decreased from 37.9% to 24.7% among urban patients (P
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?