Abstract:Background The cocreation of eHealth solutions with potential users, or co-design, can help make the solution more acceptable. However, the co-design research approach requires substantial investment, and projects are not always fruitful. Researchers have provided guidelines for the co-design approach, but these are either applicable only in specific situations or not supported by empirical data. Ways to optimize the experience of the co-design process from the point of view of the participants are also missing. Scientific literature in the co-design field generally provides an extrinsic description of the experience of participants in co-design projects. Objective We addressed this issue by describing a co-design project and focusing on the participants’ experiences looking at what was significant from their point of view. Methods We used a qualitative situated cognitive anthropology approach for this study. Data were collected on a co-design research project that aimed to support the help-seeking process of caregivers of functionally dependent older adults. The methodology was based on the perspective of experience by Dewey and used the course-of-action theoretical and methodological framework. Data collection was conducted in 2 phases: observation of participants and recording of sessions and participant self-confrontation interviews using the session recordings. We interviewed 27% (20/74) of the participants. We analyzed the data through nonexclusive emerging categorization of themes using the constant comparative method. Results In total, 5 emerging themes were identified. The perception of extrinsic constraints and the effects of the situation was central and the most important theme, affecting other themes (frustrating interactions with others, learning together, destabilization, and getting personal benefits). Co-occurrences between codes allowed for a visual and narrative understanding of what was significant for the participants during this project. The results highlighted the importance of the role of the research team in preparing and moderating the sessions. They also provided a detailed description of the interactions between participants during the sessions, which is a core aspect of the co-design approach. There were positive and negative aspects of the participants’ experiences during this co-design project. Reflecting on our results, we provided potential affordances to shape the experience of participants in co-design. Conclusions Potential users are an essential component of the co-design research approach. Researchers and designers should seek to offer these users a positive and contributory experience to encourage participation in further co-design initiatives. Future research should explore how the proposed affordances influence the success of the intervention.

Experiences of participants in the co-design of a community-based health service for people with high healthcare service use

User Experience of the Co-design Research Approach in eHealth: Activity Analysis With the Course-of-Action Framework

Community-based participatory-research through co-design: supporting collaboration from all sides of disability

Transforming health-care service through consumer co-creation: directions for service design

Co-designing adult weight management services: a qualitative study exploring barriers, facilitators, and considerations for future commissioning

Development and Evaluation of a Framework for Authentic Online Co-Design: Partnership-Focussed Principles-Driven Online Co-Design

Co-designing a cancer care intervention: reflections of participants and a doctoral researcher on roles and contributions

Potentials and challenges of using co-design in health services research in low- and middle-income countries

Care coordination for chronic and complex health conditions: An experienced based co-design study engaging consumer and clinician groups for service improvement

Co-designing Diabetes Care With Patients

Co-designing policy with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: a protocol

Co-Designing Health Service Evaluation Tools That Foreground First Nation Worldviews for Better Mental Health and Wellbeing Outcomes

Re-Examining Patient-Centered Care Through Design Process

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

Using co-creation and multi-criteria decision analysis to close service gaps for underserved populations

The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement

A qualitative evaluation of a co‐design process involving young people at risk of suicide

Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design

Co-design of health educational materials with people experiencing homelessness and support workers: a scoping review

The process of co‐designing a model of social prescribing: An Australian case study

Co-designing new tools for collecting, analysing and presenting patient experience data in NHS services: working in partnership with patients and carers