Reconstructing high-resolution gridded precipitation data using an improved downscaling approach over the high altitude mountain regions of Upper Indus Basin (UIB)
Arfan Arshad,Wanchang Zhang,Zhijie Zhang,Shuhang Wang,Bo Zhang,Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema,Masoud Jafari Shalamzari
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147140
2021-08-01
Abstract:<p>Understanding the basin-scale hydrology and the spatiotemporal distribution of regional precipitation requires high precision, as well as high-resolution precipitation data. We have made an attempt to develop an Integrated Downscaling and Calibration (IDAC) framework to generate high-resolution (1 km × 1 km) gridded precipitation data. Traditionally, GWR (Geographical weighted regression) model has widely been applied to generate high-resolution precipitation data for regional scales. The GWR model generally assumes a spatially varied relationships between precipitation and its associated environmental variables, however, the relationships need to remain constant (fixed) for some variables over space. In this study, a Mixed Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) model, capable of dealing with the fixed and spatially varied environmental variables, is proposed to downscale the Original-TRMM precipitation data from a coarse resolution (0.25<sup>o</sup> × 0.25<sup>o</sup>) to a high-resolution (1 km × 1 km) for the period of 2000–2018 over the Upper Indus Basin (UIB). Additionally, accuracy of the downscaled precipitation data was further improved by merging it with the recorded data from rain gauge stations (RGS) using two calibration approaches such as Geographical Ratio Analysis (GRA) and Geographical Difference Analysis (GDA). We found MGWR to perform better given its higher R<sup>2</sup> and lower RMSE and bias values (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96; RMSE = 56.01 mm, bias = 0.014) in comparison to the GWR model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.95; RMSE = 60.76 mm, bias = 0.094). It was observed that the GDA and GRA calibrated-downscaled precipitation datasets were superior to the Original-TRMM, yet GRA outperformed GDA. Annual precipitation from downscaled and calibrated-downscaled datasets was further temporally downscaled to obtain high-resolution monthly and daily precipitations. The results revealed that the monthly-downscaled precipitation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82, bias = −0.02 and RMSE = 11.93 mm/month) and the calibrated-downscaled (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.89, bias = −0.006 and RMSE = 9.19 mm/month) series outperformed the Original-TRMM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, bias = 0.14 and RMSE = 19.8 mm/month) as compared to the RGS observations. The results of daily calibrated-downscaled precipitation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.79, bias = 0.001 and RMSE = 1.7 mm/day) were better than the Original-TRMM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.64, bias = − 0.12 and RMSE = 6.82 mm/day). In general, the proposed IDAC approach is suitable for retrieving high spatial resolution gridded data for annual, monthly, and daily time scales over the UIB with varying climate and complex topography.</p>
environmental sciences