Repeated by many versus repeated by one: Examining the role of social consensus in the relationship between repetition and belief.

Raunak M. Pillai,Lisa K. Fazio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000166
2024-04-06
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Abstract:Repetition makes statements seem more true. Studies of this illusory truth effect typically focus on verbatim repetition of claims without a specific source. However, in real life, we often encounter claims with different wordings from multiple sources. Prominent cognitive theories suggest this variation should not matter. Repetition should increase belief by making statements easier to process—regardless of its wording or source. However, theories of social influence suggest that repetition should be most influential when it reflects a consensus, like when it is paraphrased or repeated by different people. We evaluate these perspectives across three experiments ( N = 718 U.S.-based Mechanical Turk/Connect participants). Participants saw repeated claims that varied in their phrasing (verbatim vs. paraphrased) and/or number of unique sources (one vs. multiple), then rated the truth of these claims along with new ones. In line with cognitive theories, repetition increased belief, regardless of variation in the wording or source. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
psychology, experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?