Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature

Bart C J M Fauser,G David Adamson,Jacky Boivin,Georgina M Chambers,Christian de Geyter,Silke Dyer,Marcia C Inhorn,Lone Schmidt,Gamal I Serour,Basil Tarlatzis,Fernando Zegers-Hochschild,Oladapo Ashiru,Simon Brown,Karianne Bye,Carlos Calhaz-Jorge,Barbara Collura,Petra De Sutter,Luca Gianaroli,Linda Giudice,Osamu Ishihara,Edgar V Mocanu,Willem Ombelet,Rishma Pai,Guido Pennings,James Raymer,Hugh Taylor,IFFS Demographics and Access to Care Review Board

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad028

IF: 13.3

2024-01-11

Human Reproduction Update

Abstract:Family-planning policies have focused on contraceptive approaches to avoid unintended pregnancies, postpone, or terminate pregnancies and mitigate population growth. These policies have contributed to significantly slowing world population growth. Presently, half the countries worldwide exhibit a fertility rate below replacement level. Not including the effects of migration, many countries are predicted to have a population decline of >50% from 2017 to 2100, causing demographic changes with profound societal implications. Policies that optimize chances to have a child when desired increase fertility rates and are gaining interest as a family-building method. Increasingly, countries have implemented child-friendly policies (mainly financial incentives in addition to public funding of fertility treatment in a limited number of countries) to mitigate decreasing national populations. However, the extent of public spending on child benefits varies greatly from country to country. To our knowledge, this International Federation of Fertility Societies (IFFS) consensus document represents the first attempt to describe major disparities in access to fertility care in the context of the global trend of decreasing growth in the world population, based on a narrative review of the existing literature. The concept of family building , the process by which individuals or couples create or expand their families, has been largely ignored in family-planning paradigms. Family building encompasses various methods and options for individuals or couples who wish to have children. It can involve biological means, such as natural conception, as well as ART, surrogacy, adoption, and foster care. Family-building acknowledges the diverse ways in which individuals or couples can create their desired family and reflects the understanding that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to building a family. Developing education programs for young adults to increase family-building awareness and prevent infertility is urgently needed. Recommendations are provided and important knowledge gaps identified to provide professionals, the public, and policymakers with a comprehensive understanding of the role of child-friendly policies. A narrative review of the existing literature was performed by invited global leaders who themselves significantly contributed to this research field. Each section of the review was prepared by two to three experts, each of whom searched the published literature (PubMed) for peer reviewed full papers and reviews. Sections were discussed monthly by all authors and quarterly by the review board. The final document was prepared following discussions among all team members during a hybrid invitational meeting where full consensus was reached. Major advances in fertility care have dramatically improved family-building opportunities since the 1990s. Although up to 10% of all children are born as a result of fertility care in some wealthy countries, there is great variation in access to care. The high cost to patients of infertility treatment renders it unaffordable for most. Preliminary studies point to the increasing contribution of fertility care to the global population and the associated economic benefits for society. Fertility care has rarely been discussed in the context of a rapid decrease in world population growth. Soon, most countries will have an average number of children per woman far below the replacement level. While this may have a beneficial impact on the environment, underpopulation is of great concern in many countries. Although governments have implemented child-friendly policies, distinct discrepancies in access to fertility care remain. Declining fertility rates globally focus attention on the human right to build a family and the need for family-friendly policies and more accessible fertility care. LBGTQ, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual, questioning.

obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily explores the trend of declining global fertility rates and its impact on family planning and formation, proposing a consensus document based on a narrative review of existing literature. Below are the key issues the paper attempts to address:

1. **Global Decline in Fertility Rates**: The paper focuses on the significant decline in global fertility rates (total fertility rate) over the past few decades, particularly noting that by 2050 and 2100, respectively, 77% and 93% of countries will have fertility rates below the replacement level (2.1 children/woman), leading to population reductions of over 50% in many countries and profound socio-economic changes.

2. **Balancing Family Formation and Family Planning**: The paper emphasizes that over the past half-century, family planning policies have primarily focused on contraception to prevent unintended pregnancies, delay or terminate unwanted pregnancies, and control population growth, while neglecting the concept of family formation. Family formation encompasses the process by which individuals or couples create or expand their families through natural conception, assisted reproductive technologies (ART), surrogacy, adoption, and fostering.

3. **Inequitable Access to Fertility Healthcare**: Despite significant advancements in fertility healthcare services (especially assisted reproductive technologies) over the past thirty years, which have greatly increased the opportunities for family formation, there is a vast disparity in access to these services between different countries. High costs make infertility treatments unaffordable for most patients, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

4. **Social Justice and Reproductive Rights**: The paper discusses the importance of reproductive rights as a fundamental human right, arguing that couples or individuals wishing to establish families should have the right to do so without bearing an unfair burden due to the responsibility of reducing global population growth. Moreover, the paper calls for improved access to fertility healthcare for the LGBTQ+ community, single individuals, and those requiring third-party reproductive services.

5. **Economic Impact and Policy Recommendations**: Preliminary research suggests that fertility healthcare is contributing more to global populations and has economic benefits for society. However, public expenditure on child welfare varies greatly between countries, and there are still barriers to incorporating fertility healthcare into reproductive health policies in many countries, including LMICs.

In summary, the paper aims to provide a global perspective, supporting harmony between family planning and family formation, comparing fertility rate patterns and determinants, the socio-economic impact of population decline, the epidemiology of infertility and social trends affecting fertility healthcare, as well as issues of fertility awareness and prevention, and the economic and social justice aspects of access to fertility healthcare. The ultimate goal is to promote the development of more effective family formation policies, balancing individual needs with societal needs, while identifying knowledge gaps and making recommendations to help professionals, the public, and policymakers fully understand the role of fertility-friendly policies.