Abstract:Background: Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy of central-located liver lesions (LHCL) compared with traditional open hepatectomy of central-located liver lesions (OHCL) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of LHCL. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 262 patients who underwent hepatectomies involving resections of liver segment II, IV or VIII from January 2015 to June 2021 in two institutions. Patients in the LHCL group were matched in a 1:2 ratio to patients in the OHCL group. Results: After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, 61 patients remained in the LHCL group and 122 patients were in the OHCL group. What needs to be mentioned is that although not significant, patients in the OHCL group had increased lesion size (4.3 vs. 3.6 cm, p = 0.052), number (single/multiple, 84.8%/15.2% vs. 93.4%/6.6%, p = 0.097), and number of liver segments involved (one/two/three, 47.3%/42.0%/10.7% vs. 57.4%36.1%/10.7%, p = 0.393). To ensure surgical safety, fewer patients in the LHCL group underwent vascular exclusion than those in the OHCL group (p = 0.004). In addition, LHCL was associated with lower blood loss (p = 0.001) and transfusion requirement (p = 0.004). In terms of short-term outcomes, the LHCL group had significantly lower levels of peak ALT (p < 0.001), peak DBIL (p = 0.042), peak PT (p = 0.012), and higher levels of bottom ALB (p = 0.049). Moreover, the LHCL group demonstrated quicker postoperative recovery, which was represented by shorter time to first flatus, time to oral intake, time to drain off, and hospital stay (all p < 0.001). Importantly, the LHCL group had a significantly reduced occurrence of postoperative complications (p < 0.001) and similar R0 resection rates (p = 0.678) when compared to the OHCL group. Conclusion: LHCL is associated with increased safety and better perioperative outcomes and thus could be recommended for patients with central space-occupying liver lesions when appropriately selecting the surgical procedure according to the total tumor burden and carefully handled by experienced surgeons. From the experience of our center, LHCL could be performed to solitary lesion involving liver segment IV/V/VIII, <5 cm, with good safety and feasibility.

Association between surgical difficulty and tumor location based on subsegments of the Glisson branches in laparoscopic liver resection

Total Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors in the Segments with Difficult Access

The Liver Transection Area Is a Novel Predictor for Surgical Difficulty in Laparoscopic Liver Resection

Difficulty Scoring System in Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for the ventral versus the dorsal areas of segment 8

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for liver resection: a multicenter cohort study

Impact of tumor proximity to vessel on conversion in laparoscopic liver resection: A retrospective cohort study

Impact of Tumor Size on the Difficulty of Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: An International Multicenter Study

Laparoscopic segment 4b+5 liver resection for stage T3 gallbladder cancer

Application of Laparoscopic Local Resection for Gastric Tumors

Global Outcomes Benchmarks in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for Segments 7 and 8: International Multicenter Analysis

Safety and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic vs. Open Hepatectomy of Central-Located Liver Lesions: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched, Retrospective Cohort Study

Graduated Autonomy of Laparoscopic Liver Resection Based on Liver Resection Complexity: A Western and Eastern Bi-Institution Study for Learning Curve

Revisiting the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris Difficulty Classification of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with the Data from a Personal Series—Evaluations for the Difficulty of Left Medial Sectionectomy and Length of Hospital Stay

Influence of Tumor Location on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes after Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study

Advantages of laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver using ICG fluorescent navigation by the negative staining method: A comparison with open procedure

The Difficulty Grade of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Correlates with Long-Term Outcomes

Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma complicated with significant portal hypertension: A propensity score-matched survival analysis

Does Pathological T-Factor Affect Long-term Prognosis of Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection?

Impact of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension on minimally invasive limited liver resection for primary liver malignancies in the posterosuperior segments: An international multicenter study

Laparoscopic anatomic combined subsegmentectomy of segment 8 via the tailored strategy using digital intelligent technology