Differences in prescribing errors between electronic prescribing and traditional prescribing among medical students: A randomized pilot study

Samir El Abdouni,Laura S. Kalfsvel,Wim J. R. Rietdijk,Hugo Van der Kuy,Floor van Rosse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16053
2024-03-25
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Abstract:Aims This randomized controlled pilot study aimed to assess the differences in the frequency, type and severity of prescribing errors made by medical students when assessed in an electronic (e‐)prescribing system compared to a traditional prescribing method (e.g., typing out a prescription). Methods Fourth year medical students in the period of 1 November to 31 July 2023, were asked to participate in this single‐centre prospective, randomized, controlled intervention study. Participants performed a prescribing assessment in either an e‐prescribing system (intervention group) or in a more traditional prescribing platform (control group). The prescriptions were checked for errors, graded and categorized. Differences in prescribing errors, error categories and severity were analysed. Results Out of 334 students, 84 participated in the study. Nearly all participants (98.8%) made 1 or more prescribing errors, primarily involving inadequate information errors. In the intervention group, more participants made prescribing errors involving the prescribed amount (71.4 vs. 19.0%; P
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?