Intrapartum ultrasound for cervical dilatation: Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement

Arwa Hanidu,Mariya Kovalenko,Sana Usman,Lorenzo Monasta,Giulia Zamagni,Tamara Stampalija,Christoph Lees
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14970
2024-09-16
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:Transperineal ultrasound enables visualization and objective measurement of the cervical rim during labor, across varying cervical dilatations and irrespective of membrane status. The measurements of cervical dilatation correlate highly with digital vaginal examinations showing minimal observer variation. Introduction Digital vaginal examination (DVE) is considered the standard of care for assessing labor progress and cervical dilatation. However, it may be painful and is a subjective method that can increase the risk of chorioamnionitis. Known inter‐ and intra‐observer variability exists in measurements of cervical dilatation obtained digitally. However, little is known about the inter‐ and intra‐observer variability when using intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). Our objectives were to investigate the relationship between cervical dilatation as assessed by TPUS and DVE. To assess inter‐ and intra‐observer variability in both single and repeated ultrasound assessments of cervical dilatation during active labor. Material and Methods This single‐center study was conducted at an inner‐city maternity unit in London, UK. Nulliparous participants at term with a live, singleton fetus in cephalic presentation were recruited between May 2021 and November 2022. During active labor, TPUS was performed subsequent to DVE. Repeat ultrasound assessments were performed where feasible. Participants were in a supine position, with flexed hips and knees and with an empty bladder. The ultrasound transducer was placed transversely on the maternal perineum. The anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the cervix was measured, and two‐dimensional (2D) cine‐loop videos were analyzed to obtain accurate measurements. Data were excluded if the time difference between DVE and TPUS exceeded 60 min. Results Of the 206 participants who consented to the study, complete data were obtained from 110 participants, yielding 147 paired TPUS and DVE observations. Ninety‐six participants were excluded. The absolute difference between TPUS and DVE assessments was 0 cm in 34% of the observations, 1 cm in 46.3%, and between 2 and 4 cm in 19.7%. The mean difference was −0.9 cm (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.85; p
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?