Abstract:RATIONALE: The purpose of this study is to report evidence supporting the use of ACT for identifying adolescents at risk of poorly controlled asthma.METHODS: ACT was administered to 79 asthma patients (12-17 years) in asthma specialist's offices. ACT was scored on a scale from 5 (not controlled at all) to 25 (completely controlled). The specialist's global assessment of asthma control after spirometry was also collected for each patient. Internal consistency reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used to test the discriminant validity of ACT scores across specialist's control ratings. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT for use in screening for asthma control problems, as defined by the specialist control ratings.RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of ACT scores was 0.82. In support of discriminant validity, mean ACT scores differed significantly (F=10.2, p<0.001) across groups of patients differing in specialist asthma control ratings. The mean ACT score of patients rated as “not controlled at all” was the lowest (12.7), followed by “poorly controlled” (14.9), followed by “somewhat controlled” (17.7). The mean ACT scores of patients rated as “well controlled” and “completely controlled” were 20.9 and 22.0, respectively. Using a cut-point score of ≤19 established in adults for screening of asthma control problems, ACT had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 77%, respectively, correctly classified 74% of patients, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.74.CONCLUSIONS: ACT is reliable and valid measure of asthma control with adolescent patients. RATIONALE: The purpose of this study is to report evidence supporting the use of ACT for identifying adolescents at risk of poorly controlled asthma. METHODS: ACT was administered to 79 asthma patients (12-17 years) in asthma specialist's offices. ACT was scored on a scale from 5 (not controlled at all) to 25 (completely controlled). The specialist's global assessment of asthma control after spirometry was also collected for each patient. Internal consistency reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used to test the discriminant validity of ACT scores across specialist's control ratings. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT for use in screening for asthma control problems, as defined by the specialist control ratings. RESULTS: The internal consistency reliability of ACT scores was 0.82. In support of discriminant validity, mean ACT scores differed significantly (F=10.2, p<0.001) across groups of patients differing in specialist asthma control ratings. The mean ACT score of patients rated as “not controlled at all” was the lowest (12.7), followed by “poorly controlled” (14.9), followed by “somewhat controlled” (17.7). The mean ACT scores of patients rated as “well controlled” and “completely controlled” were 20.9 and 22.0, respectively. Using a cut-point score of ≤19 established in adults for screening of asthma control problems, ACT had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 77%, respectively, correctly classified 74% of patients, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: ACT is reliable and valid measure of asthma control with adolescent patients.

Validation of the Asthma Severity Scoring System (ASSESS) in the ALLIANCE cohort

Performance of the Asthma Control Test™ (ACT) in adolescent patients with asthma

Validation of the adult asthma epidemiological score: a secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA population-based study

Asthma Daytime Symptom Diary (ADSD) and Asthma Nighttime Symptom Diary (ANSD): Measurement Properties of Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measures

Development and validation of asthma diagnostic scale for children

Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire

Development and validation of an electronic daily control score for asthma (e-DASTHMA): a real-world direct patient data study

Psychometric validation of EQ-5D-Y in children with asthma and their caregivers

An examination of factorial invariance of the Asthma Control Questionnaire among adults with severe asthma

The external validation of the asthma prediction tool in the French ELFE cohort

Development and validation of a score assessing the risk of severe asthma in primary care

T-high asthma phenotypes across life span

Asthma and rhinitis control in adolescents and young adults: A real‐world MASK‐air study

Rationale, Reliability and Validity of Childhood Asthma Screening Questionnaire

Association Between Childhood Asthma Control Test Scores and Lung Pathophysiologic Indicators in Longitudinal Measurements.

Agreement in reporting of asthma by parents or offspring – the RHINESSA generation study

Association between asthma symptom scores and perceived stress and trait anxiety in adolescents with asthma.

Deriving and validating an asthma diagnosis prediction model for children and young people in primary care

Evaluation of a short form for measuring health-related quality of life among pediatric asthma patients

Asthma Control Test and Bronchial Challenge with Exercise in Pediatric Asthma

Concurrent validity, cut-offs and ability to change of patient-reported outcome measures for rhinitis and asthma in MASK-air®