A school-based cluster-randomized pragmatic trial to control dental caries using minimally invasive interventions
Ryan Richard Ruff,Aditi Gawande,Qianhui Xu,Tamarinda J. Barry Godin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.22.24315936
2024-10-23
Abstract:Background: Evidence-based non-surgical interventions to halt the progression of dental caries, the most prevalent noncommunicable disease in the world, include atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and silver diamine fluoride (SDF). Data are needed on their effectiveness when used in school caries prevention programs. Methods: In this school-based, cluster-randomized pragmatic trial conducted from February 1, 2018 to June 1, 2023, 48 primary schools in New York City were randomly assigned to receive either silver diamine fluoride or atraumatic restorations for untreated caries on any mesial, occlusal, distal, buccal, and lingual surface of permanent molars, premolars, and primary molars. Children were treated by either dental hygienists, pediatric dentists, or medical nurses (SDF group only). Dental caries was diagnosed as any lesion scoring either 5 or 6 on the ICDAS scale. The primary outcome was the caries control rate. Results: A total of 7418 children were enrolled in the trial, of which 2338 (1193 in the SDF group, 1145 in the ART group) presented with treatable dental caries and completed at least one follow-up observation. The total surface-level failure in the SDF group was 32.5%, compared to 32% in the ART group. There were 461 failures observed in SDF participants over 1105 person-years, compared to 431 ART failures over 1039 person-years, yielding an incidence rate ratio of 1.01 (95% CI = 0.88, 1.15). Within the SDF group, children treated by nurses were at lower risk of failure than those treated by other clinicians (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.59, 0.96). Additionally, children with more affected surfaces had higher chances of failure (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.13), though this did not differ across treatment groups. Conclusions: In this four-year pragmatic trial of school-based utilization of minimally invasive interventions for dental caries, similar control rates were observed in children receiving either SDF or ART. These results support the use of secondary preventive therapies for school dental programs.