169. Combining Metformin and Clemastine for Enhanced Remyelination in Multiple Sclerosis

Asma Samir Alskaf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2024.106130
IF: 4.808
2024-12-15
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
Abstract:Background/Objective(s) Combining metformin with clemastine may offer a safer and more effective way to promote remyelination in MS patients. These findings suggest a new therapeutic approach to treating MS, especially for patients with relapsing-remitting forms of the disease. However, further research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects and safety of this combination, particularly in progressive MS patients, where clemastine alone has shown adverse effects. Material(s) and Method(s) The study evaluates the combination of metformin and clemastine in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients. This ongoing Phase 2 trial (NCT05131828) involves 50 patients, aged 25–50, on stable disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Participants are divided into two groups: one receives the combination therapy (metformin 500 mg and clemastine 1.34 mg), while the other group receives a placebo. The trial tracks changes in myelin repair using Visual-Evoked Potentials (VEP), a biomarker of remyelination【21†source. Data is also being collected on: Neuroprotection markers such as neurofilament light chain (NfL) and inflammatory biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), including C-reactive protein and pyroptosis-related proteins. Result(s) Preliminary findings suggest that the combination of clemastine and metformin leads to improved outcomes compared to clemastine alone. Patients receiving the combination therapy showed a reduction in VEP latency, indicating faster nerve signaling and enhanced remyelination. Moreover, neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels decreased, suggesting that the combination has a protective effect on neurons Conclusion(s) Combining metformin with clemastine may offer a safer and more effective way to promote remyelination in MS patients. These findings suggest a new therapeutic approach to treating MS, especially for patients with relapsing-remitting forms of the disease. However, further research is needed to fully understand the long-term effects and safety of this combination, particularly in progressive MS patients, where clemastine alone has shown adverse effects.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?