Abstract:This panel was convened at 10:45 am, Friday, April 5, by its moderator, Wenhua Shan of Xi'an Jiaotong University, who introduced the panelists: Chen Fuli of the Ministry of Commerce, Embassy of China; Chen Huiping of the School of Law, Xiamen University; Mark Feldman of Peking University School of Transnational Law; and Won Kidane of Seattle University School of Law. * * Chen Fuli did not submit remarks for the Proceedings. REFLECTIONS ON CHINA-AFRICA BITS By Won Kidane ([dagger]) BACKGROUND The rise in the last decade of Chinese investment in Africa (1) continues to be a subject of curiosity. (2) Traditionally, the bulk of foreign investment flew North-South but rarely SouthSouth. (3) This is changing as China becomes an important player as a sender of foreign direct investment (FDI). In the 21st century, international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), have become the principal means of protection of foreign investment. (4) These investment treaties themselves lie along a spectrum representing the balance of power of their own era. Much like U.S. BITs, China's BITs are said to have gone through at least three generational modifications. (5) China has employed all three generations to protect its investment in Africa. Do China's BITs tell a story of a nation's rapid transformation from a recipient of FDI to a sender of FDI? Or do they paint a more complicated picture? China's approach to investment in Africa appears to be different from the approaches that Africa's traditional partners from Europe and North America have taken over the years. A 2010 UNCTAD report describes such difference in the following terms: [I]n contrast to Africa's relationship with traditional partners, the new partnerships ... often have established forums and dialogue platforms and are generally supported by frequent high-level official visits. Furthermore, they are based on the principle of noninterference in the internal affairs of partner countries. Consequently, they are not associated with policy conditionality as has been the case in relations with traditional partners. (6) The report states further that "[the] big Southern partners [mainly China] generally use official flows to promote trade and investment activities in Africa. Furthermore, Southern partners do not consider their financial contributions to other developing countries as aid. Rather they describe them as 'expressions of solidarity and cooperation borne out of shared experiences and sympathies.'" (7) Although the role of China's involvement in Africa remains a subject of great controversy and heated debate, (8) it is clear that Africa's recent and unprecedented growth is not entirely unrelated to Chinese investment and trade. (9) Be that as it may, China's economic interest in Africa is not all that different from Africa's traditional partners. Its means of pursuing the economic goals are also similar--although as Ambassador David Shinn puts it--China employs different tactics that might make it more acceptable to Africa. In his own words: [T]he United States and China use essentially the same political economic, military and cultural tools for implementing their relations with Africa. The emphasis the two sides place on these tactics, however, and the way they implement policy varies considerably. China presents itself more humbly in its interaction with Africa. Having served as the leader of the Western world since the end of the Second World War and the only superpower since the end of the Cold War, the United States often comes across in Africa as insensitive ... (10) The current China-Africa economic engagement is undoubtedly full of benefits and risks (11) arguably to both sides. The legal infrastructure for the management of such risks is in a state of development. …

Framing of development policies toward Africa: a comparative study of China and the European Union

Integrating Africa to Global Economy: Seeking a Trilateral Partnership of Sino-US and European Union

Difference or Indifference: China's Development Assistance Unpacked

China ’ S Foreign Aid Policy and Architecture

Pivot to the South: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals through China's Belt and Road Initiative

Under a money tree? Comparing the determinants of Western and Chinese development finance flows to Africa

ICT Aid Flows From China to African Countries: A Communication Network Perspective

Deyelopment of International Aid to African Education and Its Enlightenment to China

China’s and India’s Economic Engagement in Africa: Similar Patterns, Different Dynamics

Crossing the Divide:Studies of Sino-African Relationship from an Open Perspective of Social Sciences

General Catch-up and Local Surpassing——Looking at China's Prospects by Comparing Sino-EU Long-term Development Performance

China and the European Union’s Participation in Conflict Resolution: Norm Dynamics, Convergence and Divergence in Foreign Policy

Complementarity and Rivalry in EU?China Economic Relations in the Twenty-First Century

China-Africa Investment Treaties and Dispute Settlement: A Piece of the Multipolar Puzzle

Is China Recolonizing Africa? Some Views from Tanzania

An Analysis of the French aid to Africa:Past and Present——Also on the Work of China's Aid to Africa with Some Reflections

Comparative Analysis of European Union Foreign Policy and African Union Foreign Policy: A Study of Objectives, Strategies and Challenges

An Analysis of the Development of China-Africa Relationship

Neo-colonialism or De-colonialism? Chinas Economic Engagement in Africa and the Implications for World Order

The Lure of Technocracy? Chinese Aid and Local Preferences for Development Leadership in Africa

Foreign Aid and Soft Power: Great Power Competition in Africa in the Early Twenty-first Century