Sofia S. Martinez,Constantine Samaras,Sofia S Martinez
Abstract:The transportation sector is the largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) in the United States. Increased use of public transit and electrification of public transit could help reduce these emissions. The electrification of public transit systems could also reduce air pollutant emissions in densely populated areas, where air pollution disproportionally burdens vulnerable communities with high health impacts and associated social costs. We analyze the life cycle emissions of transit...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the key problems faced in the electrification process of the American public transportation bus fleet, mainly focusing on the following aspects:
1. **Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction**: The paper analyzes the emissions of buses with different fuel types (electricity, diesel, gasoline, and compressed natural gas) throughout their life cycles, and models and predicts how much greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutant emissions can be reduced if the American public transportation bus fleet completely shifts to electric. Research shows that in the next 14 years, depending on the speed of transformation and the speed of grid decarbonization, electric buses can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 33% - 65%.
2. **Air Pollution Mitigation**: Electrification not only helps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but also significantly reduces the emissions of conventional air pollutants (such as CO, SOx, NOx, PM10, PM2.5, and VOCs), especially in densely populated areas where air pollution has a particularly serious impact on vulnerable communities.
3. **Cost - Benefit Analysis**: The paper also conducts a levelized cost of driving (LCOD) analysis, comparing the comprehensive costs of buses with different fuel types in terms of capital cost, maintenance cost, infrastructure cost, fuel efficiency, and fuel price. The study finds that although the levelized driving cost of electric buses is currently still higher than that of diesel buses, if the social cost of carbon (SCC) and other health benefits are considered, electric bus technology may reach or be lower than the cost level of diesel buses.
4. **Transformation Strategy Evaluation**: The paper proposes several different transformation scenarios, including immediately replacing all diesel buses, natural phasing - out, a gradual transformation of 5% per year, and only replacing the fleets of the 100 largest public transportation agencies. Through the comparison of these scenarios, the impacts of different transformation paths on emission reduction effects and costs are evaluated.
Overall, this paper aims to provide scientific basis for decision - makers through detailed life - cycle emission analysis and cost - benefit assessment to support the transformation of the American public transportation bus fleet towards electrification, thereby achieving the goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and improving air quality.