Incorporating radiomic feature of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET improves survival stratification in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma

Yu-Hung Chen,Tso-Fu Wang,Sung-Chao Chu,Chih-Bin Lin,Ling-Yi Wang,Kun-Han Lue,Shu-Hsin Liu,Sheng-Chieh Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244502
IF: 3.7
2020-12-28
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Background To investigate the survival prognostic value of the radiomic features of 18 F-FDG PET in patients who had EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutated lung adenocarcinoma and received targeted TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) treatment. Methods Fifty-one patients with stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma and actionable EGFR mutation who received first-line TKI were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent pretreatment 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and we calculated the PET-derived radiomic features. Cox proportional hazard model was used to examine the association between the radiomic features and the survival outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A score model was established according to the independent prognostic predictors and we compared this model to the TNM staging system using Harrell's concordance index (c-index). Results Forty-eight patients (94.1%) experienced disease progression and 41 patients (80.4%) died. Primary tumor SUV entropy > 5.36, and presence of pleural effusion were independently associated with worse OS (both p < 0.001) and PFS ( p = 0.001, and 0.003, respectively). We used these two survival predictors to devise a scoring system (score 0–2). Patients with a score of 1 or 2 had a worse survival than those with a score of 0 (HR for OS: 3.6, p = 0.006 for score 1, and HR: 21.8, p < 0.001 for score 2; HR for PFS: 2.2, p = 0.027 for score 1 and HR: 8.8, p < 0.001 for score 2). Our scoring system surpassed the TNM staging system (c-index = 0.691 versus 0.574, p = 0.013 for OS, and c-index = 0.649 versus 0.517, p = 0.004 for PFS). Conclusions In this preliminary study, combining PET radiomics with clinical risk factors may improve survival stratification in stage III-IV lung adenocarcinoma with actionable EFGR mutation. Our proposed scoring system may assist with optimization of individualized treatment strategies in these patients.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?