Species‐group responses improve our understanding of the effects of community dominants on subordinate species along a grazing gradient

Khadijeh Bahalkeh,Mehdi Abedi,Ghasem Ali Dianati Tilaki,Richard Michalet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12789
2024-06-15
Applied Vegetation Science
Abstract:We quantified the cover of understorey species under the shrub Artemisia sieberi and in open plots along a grazing gradient in an arid steppe. Understorey species were grouped with a cluster analysis following a principal component analysis conducted on their responses to the shrub. Our study adds new evidence along a grazing gradient that communities include different species groups with contrasting responses to dominant species. Study plots along a grazing gradient close to the border of Artemisia steppes in Golestan National Park. A. sieberi is the dominant species in this habitat. Questions Plant communities have been shown to include several functional groups of species that may have contrasting responses to the effects of dominant neighbours, although potentially balancing at the community level. We aimed to assess the potential of species‐group vs community‐level responses of subordinate species to explain variation in the effects of the dominant shrub Artemisia sieberi on understorey species along a grazing intensity gradient in arid steppes of northeast Iran. We also aimed to assess whether species‐group responses help explain variation in community composition. Locations An Artemisia steppe community in Golestan National Park (northeast Iran). Methods We used the relative interaction index (RII) to quantify the effects of a shrub on the cover of the 12 most frequent subordinate species. We conducted a first principal component analysis (PCA) on species RII followed by cluster analysis to group species depending on their responses to the shrub, and a second PCA on subordinate species composition. Results At the community level, subordinate species showed strong competition at the low grazing level, weak facilitation at the intermediate level and weak competition at the high grazing level; a unimodal pattern with a switch back to competition in extremely disturbed conditions that is inconsistent with ecological theories. However, species‐group analyses showed contrasting subordinate species responses, supporting either the decrease in competition with increasing disturbance scenario or the collapse of facilitation, but never a switch back to competition as predicted by recent facilitation theory along resource gradients. Moreover, these contrasting species‐group responses significantly explained community composition. Conclusions Our study provides new evidence, along a grazing intensity gradient, that communities include different species groups with contrasting responses to dominant species.
ecology,plant sciences,forestry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?