Planning for More Resilient and Safer Cities: A New Methodology for Seismic Risk Assessment at the Urban Scale, Applied to a Case Study in Italy

Benedetta Baldassarre,Elisa Conticelli,Angela Santangelo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051892

IF: 3.9

2024-02-26

Sustainability

Abstract:Recent seismic events and the damages related to them have highlighted the crucial role of urban planning in coping with the fragility and intrinsic vulnerability of cities. The paper presents a methodology for assessing seismic risk at an urban scale, expanding from a single-building investigation to an urban-scale analysis by adopting an empirical method for assessing the vulnerability of the urban fabric. Data collection and analysis have been conducted through the Geographic Information System (GIS). The methodology has been applied to the Italian city of Castelfranco Emilia, in the Emilia-Romagna region, where the current regional urban planning law is guiding municipalities towards the development of strategies mostly oriented toward the retrofit of the existing building stock and the overall regeneration of the urbanized territory, in accordance with the target of no net land take by 2050. The novelty of the method stands in the transposition of approaches born in the civil engineering and protection domains to the urban planning sphere, stressing the importance of developing urban planning instruments which are well-integrated with vulnerability assessments and, therefore, able to successfully incorporate risk considerations in the decision making.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to propose a new method for assessing earthquake risk at an urban scale. Specifically, the goals of the paper include:

1. **Extending single building assessment to urban scale**: Expanding the seismic vulnerability assessment of a single building to the scale of an entire city to evaluate overall earthquake risk.
2. **Using empirical methods to assess urban structural vulnerability**: Employing empirical methods to assess the vulnerability of urban structures, thereby providing useful information for decision-makers.
3. **Combining strategies from civil engineering and conservation fields**: Applying strategies from the fields of civil engineering and conservation to urban planning, designing urban regeneration strategies that address the current earthquake risk situation, and promoting more targeted risk reduction interventions.
4. **Providing a quick and easy-to-use risk assessment tool**: Offering policymakers and civil servants a fast and easy-to-apply tool to identify seismic vulnerability at an urban scale and successfully incorporate earthquake considerations into the decision-making process.

The focus of the paper is on developing a simplified and rapid method that enables urban planners to better address earthquake risks, enhancing the resilience and safety of cities.