Non-inferiority of intermittent theta burst stimulation over the left V 1 vs. classical target for depression: A randomized, double-blind trial
Yan Kong,Jiawei Zhou,Mingge Zhao,Yuhua Zhang,Tingting Tan,Zhi Xu,Zhenghua Hou,Yonggui Yuan,Liangliang Tan,Ruize Song,Yachen Shi,Haixia Feng,Wei Wu,Yang Zhao,Zhijun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.09.024
IF: 6.533
2023-09-26
Journal of Affective Disorders
Abstract:Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the visual cortex (VC) has shown antidepressant effects for major depressive disorder (MDD) in sham-controlled trials, but comparisons with rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are lacking. We aimed to determine the non-inferiority of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over VC vs DLPFC for MDD. Methods Participants randomly received navigated iTBS over the left V 1 or the left DLPFC twice daily for 14 days with a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score from baseline to treatment end, with 2.5 points as the non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included: improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); response and remission rates; suicidal ideation and adverse events. Results Of 75 randomized patients, 67 completed full treatment, including 52 first-episode patients and 15 relapsers. The primary outcome indicated the non-inferiority of VC (adjusted difference 1.14, lower 97.5 % CI −1.24; p = .002), confirmed by improvements in objective cognitive task and protein levels, as did most secondary outcomes. Reduced suicidal ideation after treatment, incidence of eye discomfort and pain score were lower in the VC group. Conclusions Left VC iTBS has the potential to be non-inferior to DLPFC iTBS in most first-episode MDD in improving depressive symptoms and cognitive function, with less suicidal ideation and adverse events. Limitations Given the limited sample size, the lack of a sham control and the use of antidepressants, the findings should be interpreted with caution.
psychiatry,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?