Abstract:Purpose This research paper aims to integrate the employee-related factors that empirical literature considers antecedents of performance (skills, work motivation, personal characteristics) into a multiple linear regression model, and to test such a model in order to measure the level of each individual factor on the performance. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative, multisource research approach. After testing the validity of the model with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis, this research applies the multiple linear regression model Work performance = a(Skills) + b(Work Motivation) + c(Personal Characteristics) + e(constant) to two different samples of workers: chemical technicians (N = 63) and salespeople (N = 61). Findings This study confirms the factorial structure of the antecedents of work performance, showing that skills, motivation, and personal characteristics are three general employee-related factors underlying work performance. The statistical analysis highlights a variance in performance between 40 and 65% explained by employee-related factors, hence leaving 35–60% as due to factors outside the model (firm/environment-related and/or job-related factors, or other skills and personal characteristics not considered in the model). The study also highlights that employee-related factors sometimes affect performance differently than job designers' expectations, and sometimes even negatively. Research limitations/implications The equation was tested on two case studies, so further explorations are needed. Furthermore, the approach adopted is inductive thus describing performance as it is, not as it should be. Therefore, it explains the best actual performance of workers, not the ideal performance. Practical implications The equation tested here represents a simple and valid tool to guide many Human Resource Management practices, such as; selection, training, development, and career orientation. Social implications Findings provide a valid indication for designing and managing human resource management systems more even-handedly, from an organizational and employee point of view. In doing so, it drives organizations towards a better Person/Job fit. Originality/value The study represents one of the first attempts to take into consideration multiple factors simultaneously in explaining work performance.

The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance

Individual adaptive performance in organizations: A review

Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research

Performance Management: A Model and Research Agenda

The employee-related antecedents of work performance: exploring a three-sided model for Human Resources Management

The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future

Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach

PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL AND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: A LATENT GROWTH MODELING APPROACH

A Process Perspective on Adaptive Performance: Research Insights and New Directions

Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review

Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition

Structure Equation Model of Causal Factors Affecting Employees’ Performance in Modern Trade Organization

Rethinking work-health models for the new global economy: A qualitative analysis of emerging dimensions of work

Performance management systems: A conceptual model

The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis

Work functioning: A conceptual framework

Performance Feedback and Organizational Responses: A Literature Review and Prospects

Productivity as a Performance Measure

A Cognitive Evaluation and Equity-Based Perspective of Pay for Performance on Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model

Measuring organizational performance in strategic human resource management: Problems, prospects and performance information markets

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment