Life style and cancer: Effect of divorce
K. Hemminki,Yongwen Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10195
2002-03-10
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:Dear Sir, In a recent issue of the International Journal of Cancer, Lambe and co-workers1 investigated the risk of breast cancer in women who had had children with different partners. The results were negative, in contrast to some but not all earlier studies, which have tested the hypothesis that women who have children with different men develop diverse antibodies against fetal antigens and are protected from breast cancer.2,3 Few studies using other cancer sites have been carried out on the effects of divorce, even though it is a major life event attributable to diverse lifestyle and socioeconomic factors. In a series of studies on Norwegian women, cervical and lung cancers were found to be increased among divorced women, whereas cancers of the thyroid, endometrium, colorectum and breast were decreased, in addition to melanomas and hematologic malignancies.4,5 Even less is known about the male consequences of divorce and life with a divorced partner. Again, Norwegian data suggest that divorced men may be at risk of prostate cancer, yet the results were of borderline significance.6 Due to the lack of data on cancer risks after divorce (we use “divorce” only as a technical term because in Sweden many couples who have children are not formally married), we used the latest update of the Swedish Family-Cancer Database to study the effects of divorce in 1 particular type of situation, and risks were calculated as follows: (i) for women who had had children with 2 or more men, compared with those who had only 1 father to their children, or who had only 1 child; and (ii) for men from such unions, i.e., for the last fathers of the couple’s common children, without consideration of whether or not the men had been divorced. The reason for selecting the last rather than the first male partner was that they were the ones who continued living with the women under study. Our hypotheses were that tobaccoand alcohol-related and sexually transmitted cancers were more common in women who had children with different partners, and similar findings were assumed for their partners. A further hypothesis was that divorced women were economically deprived and would show a decrease in affluent lifestyle cancers such as colon cancer and melanoma. The 2001 update of the nation-wide Swedish Family-Cancer Database, covering over 10.2 million individuals and 0.76 million invasive cancers, was used to calculate site-specific cancer risks among women and their partners.7 The Database includes offspring born since 1932 and their biologic parents; it is linked to the nation-wide Swedish Cancer Registry from the years 1958–1998, which has been described in detail in this journal.8 The following ICD-7 codes were pooled: upper aerodigestive cancer (larynx, lip, mouth and pharynx) and leukemia (leukemia, polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis). Rectal cancer was divided into cancers of the anus and mucosal rectum. Skin cancer was squamous cell carcinoma because basal cell carcinoma of the skin has not been registered in the Cancer Registry. The study included only couples who had the last child of the particular woman together. Follow-up was started at birth of the couple’s last child or January 1, 1958, whichever came latest. Follow-up was terminated on death, emigration or the closing date of the study, December 31, 1998. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as the ratio of observed (O) to expected (E) number of cases. The expected numbers were calculated from 5-year age, sex, tumor type, region (large cities and the rest of the country), period and socioeconomic status (manual workers, blue collar worker, professionals and other) specific standard incidence rates for all women or men. The data on residential region and socioeconomic status were obtained from a national census. For breast, endometrial and ovarian cancers, further adjustments were made for parity and age at first birth, both calculated from the Database.9 Confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution.10 Cancer sites were included in the study if a total of more than 1,000 cases were recorded, or if any of the comparisons were significant. SIRs are shown in Table I in 3 groups of women, those with 2 or more children with 1 partner or more partners, and those with 1 child only. Among women who had had children with a single husband, all the SIRs were close to unity even though some were formally significant because of the large numbers. The SIRs were 0.87 for lung, 0.88 for laryngeal and 0.93 for cervical cancers; the highest SIR was 1.03 for melanoma. When a woman had had 1 child, the SIRs were close to 1.00, i.e., they ranged from 0.99 to 1.03 (Table I). Women who had had children with 2 or more men showed both increased and decreased SIRs. The highest SIRs were 1.64 for cervical, 1.55 for laryngeal, 1.48 for anal and 1.33 for lung cancers. Even increases at the upper aerodigestive tract, other female genitals, bladder and endocrine glands were significant. The SIRs for cancer of the esophagus, small intestine, kidney, skin and connective tissue and for Hodgkin’s disease were not changed. All the remaining cancer sites showed a decrease in risk,