Abstract:replying to L. Carmignani et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02548-9 (2024) Carmignani and colleagues 1 contend that our identification of the oldest and easternmost Initial Upper Palaeolithic (IUP) attribution at Shiyu, northern China 2 is based on a misuse of technological definitions and biased artefact sampling. However, this criticism is hampered by restrictive Eurocentric definitions and methodological misunderstandings. Carmignani et al. 1 apply a narrow definition of the Asian IUP based on the presence of points and blades reduced from sub-volumetric, non-Levallois-system burin cores. Shiyu does not perfectly conform to this definition, so they exclude its lithic industry from the IUP. We argue that this definition hampers understanding of modern human dispersals across Eurasia. Like any other discipline where classification is central, archaeologists define categories of objects and assemblages based on similarities in sets of traits. These categories are not inherently meaningful; rather, their significance arises from assumptions about underlying biological and cultural processes. The assumption that lends meaning to the IUP is that it reflects a combination of demic and cultural diffusion processes associated with the spread of Homo sapiens throughout Eurasia 3 . To understand this evolutionary history, we need to adopt a flexible comparative approach that uses the original IUP definition as a baseline rather than a set of strict, restrictive criteria. A more flexible approach may help to disentangle cultural innovations and diffusion occurring during or after demic diffusion, as well as cultural blending with local populations on a regional scale, thereby illuminating the complex interactions that certainly occurred, with possible implications for gene exchange. Success in this endeavour depends on being able to distinguish diffusion of innovation from cultural convergence. Opening up our definitions admittedly creates greater uncertainty about the drivers of similarity and the meaning that underlies cultural constructs 4,5 , but there are good reasons for taking this risk. Can we reasonably believe that in a territory of 44 million km 2 , stretching from the Arctic to the Equator, the expansion of H. sapiens over thousands of years, encountering different hominin species, was associated with a single, uniform technology? It is clear in this context that the strict application by Carmignani et al. 1 of a points, blades and volumetric burin core definition, possibly useful in characterizing the IUP in one region, will fail to capture the overall complexity of H. sapiens ' expansion in others. This strict Eurocentric definition and interpretive framework does not pay attention to regional traditions in which cultural novelties occur, possibly signalling the dispersal of H. sapiens populations. Carmignani et al. 1 suggest that Shiyu lithics share features of the European Mousterian. Implying relationship to lithic industries produced by Neanderthals discounts any element of novelty at Shiyu that could link to H. sapiens dispersal, as was suggested by previously discovered human remains at the site 6 .

Publisher Correction: Reply to: An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China

Corrigendum: Exploiting Thermochronology to Quantify Exhumation Histories and Patterns of Uplift Along the Margins of Tibet (Front. Earth Sci, (2021), 9, (688374), 10.3389/feart.2021.688374)

Corrigendum for “A Novel Kinase Subverts Aluminium Resistance by Boosting Ornithine Decarboxylase‐dependent Putrescine Biosynthesis”

Reply to: An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China

An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China

Erratum: An updated tree of Y-chromosome Haplogroup O and revised phylogenetic positions of mutations P164 and PK4

Correction to “water Contrast Between Precambrian and Phanerozoic Continental Lower Crust in Eastern China”

Erratum: Publisher Correction: Enhanced clay formation key in sustaining the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum

Author Correction: Human origins in a southern African palaeo-wetland and first migrations

Correction: Corrigendum: Autophagy-associated alpha-arrestin signaling is required for conidiogenous cell development in Magnaporthe oryzae

Erratum for Wang et al., "Promiscuous Enzymes Cause Biosynthesis of Diverse Siderophores in Shewanella oneidensis".

Erratum to: Quantifying the legacy of the Chinese Neolithic on the maternal genetic heritage of Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia

Erratum: Hunter-gatherer genetics research: Importance and avenues - CORRIGENDUM

Corrigendum: Progress on the Nephrite Sources of Jade Artifacts in Ancient China from the Perspective of Isotopes

Corrigendum to “Hydroclimatic changes in China and surroundings during the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age: Spatial patterns and possible mechanisms” [Quaternary Science Reviews 107 (2014) 98–111]

Publisher Correction: Author Correction: The origin of Rhinocerotoidea and phylogeny of Ceratomorpha (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)

Author Correction: BHMT Polymorphism and Susceptibility to PTE in Chinese Patients.

Author Correction: Speleothem record attests to stable environmental conditions during Neanderthal–modern human turnover in southern Italy

Author Correction: Craniometrics Reveal “two Layers” of Prehistoric Human Dispersal in Eastern Eurasia

Correction: Corrigendum: Possible recent warming hiatus on the northwestern Tibetan Plateau derived from ice core records

Correction: Vegetation and climate change at the southern margin of the Neo-Tethys during the Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous): Evidence from Egypt