Rehabilitation guidance effects on the perioperative anxiety of patients with single segment lumbar fusion and internal ifxation
Jiang QIN,Shu-xun HOU,Mou-wang ZHOU,Xin-bao WU,Li LI,Yan-wei L,Jia-liang ZHU,Tao LI,Xiu-xiu SHI,Yuan HU,Jin-shu TANG,Neng REN,Yu TIAN,Chun-de LI,Ning-hua WANG,Yu-xiao XIE,Peng LIN,Zhong-shi LI,Yong HAI,Hui ZHAO,Qing-yun XUE,Xin GU,Hua-song MA,Ming LU,Yuan-zheng MA,Da-wei LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-252X.2016.03.006
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore rehabilitation guidance effects on the perioperative anxiety by observing patients with single segment lumbar fusion and internal fixation. Methods We randomly selected 52 patients with lumbar degenerative changes from Auguest, 8th, 2014 to February, 1st, 2015 by computer, and divided them into the observation group and the control group at the proportion of 1 : 1. There were 29 females and 23 males, with the average age of ( 43.55 ± 12.21 ) years and the average disease course of ( 14.26 ± 8.31 ) months. In the observation group, patients received rehabilitation guidance by rehabilitation doctors and therapists preoperatively and postoperatively, while the control group by nurses for the routine rehabilitation guidance. Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS ) were evaluated in 2 groups, and re-evaluated 1-week post-operation. The correlation between pain and anxiety preoperatively and postoperatively was analyzed.Results The VAS scores of the observation group and the control group were respectively ( 6.85 ± 1.87 ) points and ( 7.38 ± 1.63 ) points before the treatment, while the SAS scores were respectively ( 46.42 ± 10.82 ) points and ( 50.35 ± 10.10 ) points. The 2 groups were comparable in the VAS scores and SAS scores (P > 0.05 ). The VAS scores decreased to ( 1.19 ± 1.36 ) points and ( 1.73 ± 1.43 ) points respectively after the treatment, while SAS scores decreased to ( 30.08 ± 6.86 ) points and ( 35.12 ± 10.08 ) points respectively. There was significant improvement compared with that before the treatment (P< 0.05 ). Statistically signiifcance existed between the two groups (P< 0.05 ), explaining the observation group was better than the control group. Moreover, VAS and SAS scores were relevant in the correlation analysis in all patients (P< 0.05 ). In the SAS analysis of the anxiety in 25 patients, females of 41 - 50 years old accounted for the vast majority ( 18 patients, 72% ), the disease course of 23 patients ( 92% ) > 1 year, and 16 patients ( 64% ) received at least 2 conservative treatment methods. After the guidance and surgical treatment, the number of patients with mild to moderate anxiety was significantly reduced.Conclusions Patients with selective surgery are in the presence of psychological anxiety, which is associated with pain, disease course, gender, expected outcomes of the disease and other factors. Proper preoperative rehabilitation guidance, especially psychological counseling, is significant in the postoperative elimination of fear and establishment of positive attitude to the surgery and recovery.