Abstract:Manual tools for pain assessment from facial expressions have been suggested and validated for several animal species. However, facial expression analysis performed by humans is prone to subjectivity and bias, and in many cases also requires special expertise and training. This has led to an increasing body of work on automated pain recognition, which has been addressed for several species, including cats. Even for experts, cats are a notoriously challenging species for pain assessment. A previous study compared two approaches to automated 'pain'/'no pain' classification from cat facial images: a deep learning approach, and an approach based on manually annotated geometric landmarks, reaching comparable accuracy results. However, the study included a very homogeneous dataset of cats and thus further research to study generalizability of pain recognition to more realistic settings is required. This study addresses the question of whether AI models can classify 'pain'/'no pain' in cats in a more realistic (multi-breed, multi-sex) setting using a more heterogeneous and thus potentially 'noisy' dataset of 84 client-owned cats. Cats were a convenience sample presented to the Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover and included individuals of different breeds, ages, sex, and with varying medical conditions/medical histories. Cats were scored by veterinary experts using the Glasgow composite measure pain scale in combination with the well-documented and comprehensive clinical history of those patients; the scoring was then used for training AI models using two different approaches. We show that in this context the landmark-based approach performs better, reaching accuracy above 77% in pain detection as opposed to only above 65% reached by the deep learning approach. Furthermore, we investigated the explainability of such machine recognition in terms of identifying facial features that are important for the machine, revealing that the region of nose and mouth seems more important for machine pain classification, while the region of ears is less important, with these findings being consistent across the models and techniques studied here.

Going Deeper than Tracking: a Survey of Computer-Vision Based Recognition of Animal Pain and Affective States

From facial expressions to algorithms: a narrative review of animal pain recognition technologies

Automated video-based pain recognition in cats using facial landmarks

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Affective States in Livestock

Automatic Recognition Methods Supporting Pain Assessment: A Survey

Affective State Recognition in Livestock—Artificial Intelligence Approaches

ARBEL: A Machine Learning Tool with Light-Based Image Analysis for Automatic Classification of 3D Pain Behaviors

Can AI detect pain and express pain empathy? A review from emotion recognition and a human-centered AI perspective

Pain recognition and pain empathy from a human-centered AI perspective

Video-based estimation of pain indicators in dogs

Sharing pain: Using pain domain transfer for video recognition of low grade orthopedic pain in horses

Accounting for Affect in Pain Level Recognition

Automated recognition of emotional states of horses from facial expressions

Explainable automated pain recognition in cats

Measuring Farm Animal Emotions—Sensor-Based Approaches

Pain assessment in horses using automatic facial expression recognition through deep learning-based modeling

Automated Assessment of Pain: Prospects, Progress, and a Path Forward

Multi-Modal Pain Intensity Recognition Based on the SenseEmotion Database

Consciousness, emotion and animal welfare: insights from cognitive science

Pain and Problem Behavior in Cats and Dogs

An Automatic System for Continuous Pain Intensity Monitoring Based on Analyzing Data from Uni-, Bi-, and Multi-Modality