Congeneric and sympatric tropical mullets respond differently to environmental variability: insights into coexistence

Jordana Rangely,Matheus de Barros,Daniele Souto-Vieira,Maria das Neves Tayana S. C. Oliveira,Victor E. L. da Silva,Ivan Oliveira de Assis,Nidia N. Fabré
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23108
2024-06-06
Marine and Freshwater Research
Abstract:Disentangling mechanisms influencing the seasonal and spatial distribution of fish is essential to understanding population dynamics. In the south-western Atlantic, the sympatric mullets Mugil curema and M. rubrioculus are closely related and use habitat similarly. However, which processes allow their coexistence is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that the two species exhibit temporally and spatially decoupled habitat-use patterns to allow sympatry due to different responses to environmental drivers. Bayesian zero-inflated count models were used to unravel spatial and temporal distribution patterns of those species in a south-western Atlantic lagoon. The two species display different distributions within the estuary, being spatially and temporally segregated, with M. curema mostly inhabiting the inner estuary and M. rubrioculus inhabiting coastal marine habitats. This decoupling in habitat use might be driven by distinct responses to environmental variability: M. curema is influenced by factors such as temperature and dissolved oxygen, whereas M. rubrioculus is influenced by variations in salinity. We suggest that the studied species evolved divergent responses to environmental variation to allow coexistence. This study suggests that environmental factors drive mullet abundance, and that zero-inflated count models incorporating those drivers are therefore useful in predicting their spatial and temporal distribution, as well as in standardising abundance trends for stock assessment efforts.
limnology,oceanography,marine & freshwater biology,fisheries
What problem does this paper attempt to address?