Efficacy and safety of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device in pulmonary hypertension

Christian Gerges,Karl Vollmers,Nika Skoro‐Sajer,Varius Dannenberg,Valerie Hartig,Marc R. Pritzker,John Scandurra,E. Kenneth Weir,Irene M. Lang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3187
2024-03-15
European Journal of Heart Failure
Abstract:Impact of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device on hemodynamics. Hemodynamics and reservoir pressures are depicted in blue during device activation and in red when the device is deactivated. Panel A demonstrates the effect of temporary device activation on pulmonary arterial (PA) and left ventricular (LV) pressures in a patient with pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH‐LHD). Panel B shows the effect of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device on pulmonary arterial compliance (CPA) and right ventricular‐to‐pulmonary vascular coupling assessed by the ratio of right ventricular end‐systolic elastance to effective arterial elastance (Ees/Ea) in patients with PH‐LHD, PH associated with chronic lung disease (PH‐CLD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, panel C). Aims A common feature of various forms of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is progressive decline of pulmonary arterial compliance (CPA), which correlates with reduced survival. In this acute study, we evaluated feasibility, safety and haemodynamic performance of the Aria pulmonary endovascular device in patients with PH associated with left heart disease (PH‐LHD) and chronic lung disease (PH‐CLD). Methods and results Eight patients with PH‐LHD and 10 patients with PH‐CLD were included in this study. The device was placed in the main pulmonary artery via the right femoral vein and was connected by a catheter to a gas‐filled reservoir outside the body. During systole, gas shifts from the balloon to the reservoir, leading to deflation of the balloon. In diastole, the gas returns from the reservoir to the balloon, leading to balloon inflation and enhancing diastolic blood flow to the distal pulmonary capillary bed. Haemodynamics were assessed at baseline, and again with device off, device on and device off. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of serious adverse events through 30 days after the procedure. No complications or investigational device‐related serious adverse events occurred. Device activation in PH‐LHD and PH‐CLD patients decreased pulmonary arterial pulse pressure by 5.6 ± 4.2 mmHg (−12%; p = 0.003) and 4.2 ± 2.2 mmHg (−11%; p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?