Abstract:Abstract Introduction Vasectomy is a widely performed procedure for male sterilization, with an estimated 33 million procedures conducted annually worldwide. Although vasectomy is generally safe and associated with minimal complications, concerns over procedural pain and anxiety can deter patients from pursuing the procedure. To address these concerns, innovations such as no-needle and no-scalpel techniques have been adopted to minimize pain during vasectomy. However, anticipated pain and anxiety remain significant barriers for patients. Therefore, optimizing patient comfort during procedures performed under local anesthesia is crucial for improving outcomes and satisfaction. Virtual reality (VR) devices have emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention for pain modulation in various medical fields. VR technology has demonstrated pain reduction and anxiety alleviation in pediatric burn therapy, physical therapy, dental procedures, and more. The adult urologic community has also embraced VR, with positive results observed in surveillance cystoscopy and office-based prostate biopsy procedures. However, limited research exists on the use of VR headsets during vasectomy, with only one previous non-randomized trial reporting high patient satisfaction but no improvement in pain or anxiety. In this ongoing single-center, randomized, open-label clinical trial, we present interim data evaluating the effectiveness of the SmileyScope VR device in reducing anxiety and pain during in-office vasectomy performed with local anesthesia. Objective The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) devices in alleviating peri-procedure anxiety and pain during in-office vasectomy performed with local anesthesia. The secondary goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of interactive VR, enabling patient control of the experience, with static VR, which does not provide patient control. Methods The study enrolled patients who were scheduled for in-office vasectomy with a single urologist. The patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the control group receiving standard in-office vasectomy without a VR headset, the static VR intervention group, or the interactive VR intervention group. The primary outcome measures included patient-reported pain and anxiety levels before and after the procedure, along with heart rate measurements recorded using a wearable device. Results Interim analysis of this ongoing study includes data from a total of 58 men. 20 men were in the control group, 19 in the static VR arm, and 19 in the interactive VR arm. There was no observed difference in subjective pain scores or heart rate variability during the procedure. However, patients who wore a VR headset reported a significantly lower level of pre-procedure anxiety (P = 0.0700). Conclusions Anticipation of periprocedural pain and anxiety are barriers to vasectomy utilization. Initial results from our ongoing randomized clinical trial indicate that the utilization of virtual reality is feasible, safe, and effective in reducing pre-procedure anxiety in patients undergoing vasectomy. Disclosure No.

Evolution of anxiety management in prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: a narrative review

The use of virtual reality hypnosis for prostate cancer patients during transperineal biopsy/gold seed implantation: A needs assessment study

(262) Virtual Reality for Improved Vasectomy Experience: Insights from a Single-Center Clinical Trial

Effect of Virtual Reality Glasses Application on Pain, Anxiety, and Patient Satisfaction During a Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Virtual Reality as a Hypnotic Tool in the Management of Anxiety During the Performance of the Axillary Block

‘Is it painful’? A qualitative study on experiences of patients before prostate needle biopsy

Using virtual reality to control preoperative anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients: A pilot study in maxillofacial and plastic surgery

The Emerging Role of Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Procedural Sedation and Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

Virtual Reality as an Adjunct to Traditional Patient Counseling in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Localized Prostate Cancer

A Preparatory Virtual Reality Experience Reduces Anxiety before Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

3D virtual models and augmented reality for radical prostatectomy: a narrative review

Risk Factors and Contemporary Management Options for Pain and Discomfort Experienced During a Prostate Biopsy

Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients

Perspectives on technology – prostate cancer: is local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy really better than transrectal biopsy?

Emotion-centered versus fact-centered medical information to alleviate pain and anxiety in prostate biopsy: A randomized trial

Exploring Relations Between Unique Patient Characteristics and Virtual Reality Immersion Level on Anxiety and Pain in Patients Undergoing Venipuncture: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Control Trial

Intraoperative use of virtual reality decreases anxiety during surgery under local anaesthesia in the head and neck region

Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Reducing Perceived Pain and Anxiety Among Patients Within a Hospital System: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

Exposure to virtual reality as a tool to reduce peri-operative anxiety in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial

Shifting to transperineal prostate biopsy: A narrative review

A systematic review of nonpharmacological interventions to reduce procedural anxiety among patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer