Abstract:Company valuation has always been highly difficult and a reason for discussion. Especially the valuation of Tech companies and 'Software as a Service'-companies (SaaS) is challenging as the most-used valuation methods are mainly focused on traditional companies with a higher amount of fixed assets. Conventional valuation methods are often based on discounted cash flows (DCFs). These are not in the same way applicable for Tech/SaaS companies since they typically have different company characteristics (e.g. hardly any fixed assets) which lead to unreliable DCF results. We introduce an alternative point of view: the ‘Rule of 40’. Conceptually, this rule of thumb states that there is a direct trade-off between a company’s growth and margin, which can therefore be added together to give an indication of a firm’s performance. The sum of the growth and margin is in the case of this research used as an indicator for the level of the firm’s valuation multiple. To find the most significant indicator, we compare 20 different combinations of Rule of 40 indicators and valuation multiples. This analysis is carried out using linear regression, in which we focus on the results of the slope and R-squared. Tech companies are retrieved using S&P's General Industry Classification Standards (GICS), and SaaS companies are selected based on a list of the 50 largest SaaS companies in America. The Tech company analysis does not result in any significant relations. Therefore we decided to focus on SaaS companies. The most significant relationship is found to be Rule of 40 indicator 'Free Cash Flow Margin + Revenue Growth', in combination with the valuation multiple 'TEV/Revenue'. Based on our literature review, we extended the applicability of the Rule of 40 by looking at different sectors with similar characteristics. E-commerce companies are also selected using GICS. The regressions for E-commerce also result in 'FCF margin + Revenue growth' as the most significant indicator in combination with 'TEV/Revenue'. From this, we conclude that the trade-off principle is applicable to both SaaS as well as E-commerce. The regressions for SaaS and E-commerce both do not result in a relationship that is significant enough to use for company valuation. Since the concept cannot be applied to valuation we test the robustness of our analyses in two different ways. We reconsider the growth + margin concept by checking the relationships using Spearman ranked correlation. The results suggest the same indicators to be most significant, which confirms earlier findings. For the second robustness check, we use winsorizing, which adjusts our data to decrease the effect of outliers. The check shows that the results for SaaS are more robust than for E-commerce. Possible reasons for this are sticky demand, customer loyalty, and customer base-scalability, which all have a positive effect for SaaS. The final conclusion is that there is a significant relationship, but that it cannot directly be used for company valuation since the relationship is not significant enough. This research adds to the existing literature with a comprehensive evaluation of the predictive powers of Rule of 40-based indicators for company valuation multiples. Another addition to the literature is the extension towards a different industry, which had not been done before. For further research, we advise using the most significant indicator from this report as a starting point for more elaborate regression research in which more variables are added such as company size, age, the percentage in recurring customers or industry subcategory within SaaS. This will lead to a more reliable source for SaaS company valuation. A point of discussion remains to which extent the conclusions are applicable to smaller companies since the current research is focused on large companies.

Brand valuation: how convergent (or divergent) are global brand rankings and how correlated is brand value to enterprise value?

Exploring the Brand Value-Shareholder Value Nexus for Consumer Goods Companies

The Gap between the Theory and Practice of Corporate Valuation: Survey of European Experts

Brand Value and Firm Performance Nexus: Further Empirical Evidence

Which Factors Matter Most? Can Startup Valuation be Micro-Targeted?

Brand equity trend analysis for top auto brands on Interbrand’s 20-year longitudinal data

How Well Does Consumer-Based Brand Equity Align with Sales-Based Brand Equity and Marketing-Mix Response?

The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Value : An Empirical Study of Top 100 Global Brands

How is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation?

How consumer-based brand equity relates to market share of global and local brands in developed and emerging countries

Investigating an alternative approach to SaaS company valuation : using ‘Rule of 40’ metrics as indicators of Enterprise Value

The Nonlinear Effects Of Brand Value On Shareholder Value

ESG Rating and Market Valuation of the Firm: Sector Approach

Brand actions and financial consequences: a review of key findings and directions for future research

The Dynamic Relationship between Investments in Brand Equity and Firm Profitability: Evidence Using Trademark Registrations

Correlation Analysis and Policy Implications of Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Value:Empirical Study Based on Famous Brands of Listed Companies

The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence

Research on Key Elements to the Value of Commercial Software——Based on the View of Brand Asset and Information Rules

Do corporate values have value? The impact of corporate values on financial performance

Valuation Models Applied to Value-Based Management. Application to the Case of UK Companies with Problems

Brand Analyses of U.S. Global and Local Brands in India: The Case of Levi's