Tobias M. Gasser,Alexander V. Thoeny,A. Dominic Fortes,Thomas Loerting
Abstract:Ice XIX is a partly hydrogen-ordered polymorph related to disordered ice VI, similar to ice XV. We here investigate the order–order–disorder sequence ice XIX→ice XV→ice VI based on calorimetry at ambient pressure both for D 2 O and H 2 O-ice XIX. From these data we extract configurational entropy differences between ice XIX, ice XV and ice VI. This task is complex because, unlike for all other ices, the order–disorder transition from ice XIX to ice VI takes place in two steps via ice XV. Even more challenging, these two steps take place in an overlapping manner, so that careful separation of slow kinetics is necessary. This is evidenced best by changing the heating rate in calorimetry experiments: For fast heating experiments the second step, disordering of ice XV, is suppressed because the first step, formation of ice XV from ice XIX, is too slow. The transient state ice VI ‡ that is initially produced upon ice XIX decay then does not have enough time to convert to ice XV, but remains disordered all along. In order to tackle the challenge to determine the entropy difference between ice XIX and VI as well as the entropy difference between ice XV and VI we employ two different approaches that allow assessing the impact of kinetics on the entropy change. "Single peak integration" defines a kinetically limited result, but "combined peak integration" allows estimation of the true thermodynamic values. Our best estimate for the true value shows ice XIX to be much more ordered than ice XV (25 ± 3% vs 9 ± 4% of the Pauling entropy). For D 2 Oice XIX samples we obtain 28% of order, but only when a small number of fast H-isotope defects are used. In the second part we use these results to estimate the location of the ice XIX phase boundary both for protiated and deuterated ice XIX. The initial Clapeyron slope at ambient pressure is determined from the combination of neutron powder diffraction volume differences and calorimetry entropy differences data to be 21 K GPa −1 with an order–disorder transition temperature T o-d (0.0 GPa) = 103 ± 1 K. An in situ bracketing experiment at 1.8 GPa yields T o-d (1.8 GPa) = 116 ± 3 K, i.e., the phase boundary slope flattens at higher pressures. These data allow us to determine the region of thermodynamic stability of ice XIX in the phase diagram and to explain the surprising isotope shift reversal at 1.6 GPa compared to 0.0 GPa, i.e., why D 2 O-ice XIX disorders at lower temperatures than H 2 O-ice XIX at 1.6 GPa, but at higher temperatures at ambient pressures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper
The paper primarily explores the configurational entropy and isotope effects of ice XIX. Specifically, the researchers focus on the differences in configurational entropy during the ordered-ordered-disordered transition process from ice XIX to ice XV and then to ice VI. This task is very complex because, unlike other ices, the ordered-disordered transition from ice XIX to ice VI occurs in two steps: first forming ice XV, and then transitioning from ice XV to ice VI. These two steps overlap in experiments, necessitating careful separation of the slow kinetic processes.
To determine the entropy differences between ice XIX and ice VI, as well as between ice XV and ice VI, the researchers employed two different methods: "single peak integration" and "composite peak integration." The former defines a kinetically constrained result, while the latter allows for the estimation of true thermodynamic values. Through these methods, the researchers found that ice XIX is more ordered than ice XV (25 ± 3% vs 9 ± 4% of Pauling entropy). For D2O ice XIX samples, when a small amount of fast H isotope defects is used, the degree of order is 28%.
Additionally, the researchers used these results to estimate the initial position of the phase boundary of ice XIX and explained the reversal of isotope effects under different pressures. For example, at a pressure of 1.6 GPa, D2O ice XIX becomes disordered at lower temperatures, whereas at ambient pressure, it becomes disordered at higher temperatures.
In summary, the paper aims to better understand the stability region of ice XIX in the water phase diagram through detailed thermal analysis and neutron diffraction experiments, accurately measuring the configurational entropy and isotope effects of ice XIX.