NGS-Guided Precision Oncology in Breast Cancer and Gynecological Tumors—A Retrospective Molecular Tumor Board Analysis

Niklas Gremke,Fiona R. Rodepeter,Julia Teply-Szymanski,Sebastian Griewing,Jelena Boekhoff,Alina Stroh,Thomas S. Tarawneh,Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild,Christina Balser,Akira Hattesohl,Martin Middeke,Petra Ross,Anne-Sophie Litmeyer,Marcel Romey,Thorsten Stiewe,Thomas Wündisch,Andreas Neubauer,Carsten Denkert,Uwe Wagner,Elisabeth K. M. Mack
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081561
2024-04-20
Cancers
Abstract:Background: Precision oncology treatments are being applied more commonly in breast and gynecological oncology through the implementation of Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), but real-world clinical outcome data remain limited. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with breast cancer (BC) and gynecological malignancies referred to our center's MTB from 2018 to 2023. The analysis covered patient characteristics, next-generation sequencing (NGS) results, MTB recommendations, therapy received, and clinical outcomes. Results: Sixty-three patients (77.8%) had metastatic disease, and forty-four patients (54.3%) had previously undergone three or more lines of systemic treatment. Personalized treatment recommendations were provided to 50 patients (63.3%), while 29 (36.7%) had no actionable target. Ultimately, 23 patients (29.1%) underwent molecular-matched treatment (MMT). Commonly altered genes in patients with pan-gyn tumors (BC and gynecological malignancies) included TP53 (n = 42/81, 51.9%), PIK3CA (n = 18/81, 22.2%), BRCA1/2 (n = 10/81, 12.3%), and ARID1A (n = 9/81, 11.1%). Patients treated with MMT showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival (median PFS 5.5 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.0014). Of all patients who underwent molecular profiling, 13.6% experienced a major clinical benefit (PFSr ≥ 1.3 and PR/SD ≥ 6 months) through precision oncology. Conclusions: NGS-guided precision oncology demonstrated improved clinical outcomes in a subgroup of patients with gynecological and breast cancers.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to evaluate the application effect of precision oncology based on next - generation sequencing (NGS) in the clinical practice of breast cancer and gynecological tumor patients. Specifically, the study explored the following aspects through retrospective analysis of treatment regimens recommended by the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB): 1. **Patient characteristics**: Analyze the clinical characteristics of patients, such as age, disease stage, number of previous treatment lines, etc. 2. **Tumor - specific genetic alterations**: Use NGS to detect genetic alterations such as gene mutations, copy number variations and fusion genes in tumor samples. 3. **Treatment recommendations**: Personalized treatment recommendations provided by MTB based on NGS results and their implementation. 4. **Clinical outcomes**: Evaluate the progression - free survival (PFS) and other clinical indicators of patients receiving molecularly - matched therapy (MMT), and compare them with those of patients not receiving MMT. ### Main findings - **Patient population**: A total of 81 breast cancer or gynecological tumor patients were included in the study, of which 77.8% had metastatic diseases and 54.3% had previously received three or more lines of systemic treatment. - **Gene alterations**: The most common gene alterations included TP53, PIK3CA, BRCA1/2 and ARID1A. The mutation frequencies of these genes were 51.9%, 22.2%, 12.3% and 11.1% respectively. - **Treatment recommendations**: 63.3% of patients (50/81) received personalized treatment recommendations, and 29.1% of patients (23/81) received molecularly - matched therapy. - **Clinical outcomes**: Patients receiving MMT showed a significantly prolonged progression - free survival (median PFS 5.5 months vs 3.5 months, p = 0.0014). 13.6% of patients obtained significant clinical benefits through precision oncology (PFSr ≥1.3 and PR/SD ≥6 months). ### Conclusion Precision oncology based on NGS shows improved clinical outcomes in some breast cancer and gynecological tumor patients, especially in those receiving molecularly - matched therapy. However, the effectiveness of this method may be limited by the evidence level of specific gene alterations and treatment feasibility. The research results provide valuable empirical data for the application of precision oncology in the real world.