Submaximal force–velocity relationships during mountain ultramarathon: Data from the field

Clément Delhaye,Pablo Rozier-Delgado,Mylène Vonderscher,Hervé Di Domenico,Maximilien Bowen,Guillaume Millet,Jean-Benoit Morin,Pierre Samozino,Baptiste Morel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2413715
IF: 3.9428
2024-10-14
Journal of Sports Sciences
Abstract:This study presents a novel method for evaluating the submaximal velocity-force (V(F)) relationship in mountain ultramarathon races using crowdsourced data from Strava.com. The dataset includes positional data from 408 participants of the 171-km UTMB® 2023 race (9,850-m D+). The race was divided into 100-m segments. The mean net propulsive force and velocity were computed for each segment to describe the submaximal V(F) relationship as a rational function of three parameters. F 1 : propulsive force at 1 m · s −1 ; V 0 : theoretical maximum velocity on flat terrain; C: curvature parameter (the lower C, the more linear the V(F) relationship). The V(F) profile parameters were found to be F 1 = 1.80 ± 0.33 N · kg −1 , V 0 = 2.36 ± 0.42 m · s −1 , and C = 0.66 ± 1.81, with good independence between the parameters within a group of homogeneous performance. The best athletes had the highest F 1 , V 0 , and C values. V(F) parameters were affected by fatigue during the race, with decreases of 20.9%, 32.0%, and 59.8% between the first and second parts of the race respectively. These findings suggest that the V(F) relationship is an interesting original approach for studying performance and fatigability during mountain ultra-endurance races.
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?