COMPARISON OF PACED, UNPAGED, IRREGULAR AND CONTINUOUS DISPLAY IN WATCH KEEPING

T. WILKINSON R,R, T. WILKINSON

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136108930525

IF: 2.5612

1961-07-01

Ergonomics

Abstract:Many vigilance tasks require the detection of a critical feature or ‘ signal ’ appearing occasionally in a long series of displays presented automatically and at regular time intervals to the observer. The question is whether this work would be carried out more efficiently if the displays were presented (a) automatically but at irregular time intervals, (b) not automatically but when called for by the observer, or (c) if the discrete displays were abandoned in favour of a continuous display forming a background of ' noise ' upon which the occasional critical feature were superimposed. These three alternatives have been compared with the first-mentioned standard form using the same basic vigilance test throughout. Nono of the alternatives was found to offer any advantages over the standard; the total numbers of signals Seen was roughly the Same and the level of signal detection still declined significantly during the watch whichever alternative was used. Comparison of alternatives (a), (6) and (c) respectively with the standard prompt the following suggestions : firstly, that predictability of the test may be unimportant in deciding the degree of vigilance decrement. Secondly when the observer calls for the displays in his own time he may continue to do this automatically during his attentional lapses, thus ho may be just as likely to miss signals as when the displays are presented automatically by a machine. The generality is questioned of the suggestion that fatigue will cause mainly failures of speed in nnpaced work and accuracy in paced. Thirdly, a regularly repeating feature of the display may not necessarily bo soporific or prejudicial to maintained vigilance. Individual measures of intelligence, neuroticism and extroversion wero unrelated to scores of signals seen and decrement in performance during the tost, for tho second of these scores this result means little because of the very low test-retest reliability of individual indices of vigilance decrement, in it3elf an interesting, though disturbing finding.

engineering, industrial,ergonomics,psychology, applied