Action research for transformative change

Thami Croeser,Sarah Clement,Marta Fernandez,Georgia E. Garrard,Ian Mell,Sarah A. Bekessy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01458-2

IF: 6

2024-01-24

Sustainability Science

Abstract:As major policy actors (e.g. governments, global organisations) grapple with 'wicked' sustainability challenges, the use of demonstration projects or 'living labs' has promise in showcasing potential solutions. However, these projects can struggle to realise enduring change, with initial experimental deliverables tending not to be replicated and remaining as once-offs. As well as demonstrating solutions, projects also need to overcome the considerable inertia in the complex systems of organisations and institutions that govern (or indeed generate) sustainability problems. Here we argue that demonstration projects, while initially impactful, could be more likely to realise transformative change if they were designed more thoroughly as action research projects, working with partners to not only deliver and measure demonstrations of solutions, but also demonstrate changes to organisations and institutions to remove barriers and facilitate replication. We note the important role of both engaged leadership and explicitly-stated theories of change in maximising the potential of projects designed in this way.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore how to achieve broader change by improving the design of demonstration projects (also known as "living labs"). The authors point out that although these projects have initial impact in showcasing solutions, they face challenges in achieving lasting change because the outcomes of these projects are often difficult to replicate and scale. To overcome this issue, the paper proposes three key points:

1. **In-depth application of action research**: The authors believe that action research should not be limited to data collection and measurement but should include preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of project actions and adopt more interpretive research methods to facilitate participants' internal observation and reflection on the work system.

2. **Clearly articulate and rigorously review the theory of change**: Behind each demonstration project is a theory of change, which is the reason why specific outcomes can be expected. However, the theory of change for many projects is not explicitly stated, leading to insufficient testing of the theory. The paper emphasizes that clearly articulating and reviewing the theory of change is crucial to ensuring the success of the project.

3. **Incorporate institutional change into the project scope and implement it by empowered leaders**: Institutional change is very important for achieving system-level change but is often overlooked. The paper suggests that the project design should include content for institutional reform and that leaders with sufficient authority are needed to drive these reforms.

In summary, the main purpose of the paper is to improve the success rate of demonstration projects in generating replicable and broadly impactful solutions by making improvements in these three areas.