Loss to Specialized Cardiology Follow-Up in Adults Living with Congenital Heart Disease

Cheryl Dickson,Danielle Osborn,David Baker,Judith Fethney,David S. Celermajer,Rachael Cordina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32604/chd.2023.044874
IF: 2.419
2024-01-01
Congenital Heart Disease
Abstract:Much has been written about the loss to follow-up in the transition between pediatric and adult Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) care centers. Much less is understood about the loss to follow-up (LTF) after a successful transition. This is critical too, as patients lost to specialised care are more likely to experience morbidity and premature mortality. To understand the prevalence and reasons for loss to follow-up (LTF) at a large Australian Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) centre. Patients with moderate or highly complex CHD and gaps in care of >3 years (defined as LTF) were identified from a comprehensive ACHD database. Structured telephone interviews examined current care and barriers to clinic attendance. Overall, 407 (22%) of ACHD patients (n = 1842) were LTF. The mean age at LTF was 31 (SD 11.5) years and 54% were male; 311 (76%) were uncontactable. Compared to adults seen regularly, lost patients were younger, with a greater socio-economic disadvantage, and had less complex CHD (p < 0.05 for all). We interviewed 59 patients (14%). The top 3 responses for care absences were “feeling well” (61%), losing track of time (36%), and not needing follow-up care (25%). A large proportion of the ACHD population becomes lost to specialised cardiac care, even after a successful transition. This Australian study reports younger age, moderate complexity defects, and socio-economic disadvantage as predictive of loss to follow-up. This study highlights the need for novel approaches to patient-centered service delivery even beyond the age of transition and resources to maintain patient engagement within the ACHD service.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?