Abstract:Introduction: Although cycling provides both individual and societal benefits, the mode share in Germany remains at a relatively low level. One reason described in literature is the lack of perceived safety due to the cycling infrastructure, especially at junctions. The study addresses the influence of junction design on cyclists' perceived safety. Method: Three intersections (BS: Berlin Standard, PI: protected intersection, CbC: cycle lanes between car lanes) and one roundabout were modeled in a virtual environment. Using a bicycle simulator, n = 46 participants cycled through each junction design, followed by a qualitative interview. We conducted a structured content analysis on the interview transcripts. Results: Regarding the quality of statements, PI provides the highest level of perceived safety whereas CbC provides the lowest level. Both roundabout and BS provide medium to low perceived safety. Specific design features, such as continuous cycling infrastructure, physical separation and elements enhancing cyclists' visibility improve participants' perceived safety. On the other hand, curbs, bends, and elements obstructing visibility decrease perceived safety. Our findings also point towards a difference between overextending and manageable interactions between cars and cyclists. While manageable interactions raise attention to an appropriate extent, overextending interactions diminish the quality of the cycling experience so that some cyclists rather violate rules instead of using the designated cycling infrastructure. Furthermore, three factors influence participants' perception of infrastructure design: comprehensibility, comfort, and perceived safety. Conclusions: To provide a cycling friendly infrastructure, planners should consider cyclists' perceived safety as well as comfort and comprehensibility. Furthermore, in contrast to isolated segments, a continuous high-quality cycling infrastructure network should be implemented. Lastly, infrastructure might focus on manageable interactions rather than cause overextending interactions. Practical application: The findings should be considered in future cycling infrastructure planning. Planners may test and modify temporary solutions to find appropriate designs for each junction.

Urban Design: Is there a Distinctive View from the Bicycle?

Conceptualizing cycling experience in urban design research: a systematic literature review

Bicycle infrastructure: can good design encourage cycling?

Urban design and planning influences on the share of trips taken by cycling

Bicycle Infrastructure Design Principles in Urban Bikeability Indices: A Systematic Review

Roadway Design Matters: Variation in Bicyclists' Psycho-Physiological Responses in Different Urban Roadway Designs

Typologies of Urban Cyclists: Review of Market Segmentation Methods for Planning Practice

Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns

Cycling subjective experience: A conceptual framework and methods review

Designing for the Interested but Concerned: A qualitative study of the needs of potential bike riders

Demand-driven design of bicycle infrastructure networks for improved urban bikeability

Towards a Cycling-Friendly City: an Updated Review of the Associations Between Built Environment and Cycling Behaviors (2007–2017)

Motivations and Strategies for Bicycle Planning in Rural, Suburban, and Low-Density Communities: The Need for New Best Practices

Safe cycling space: How it is produced and experienced by cyclists

Cyclists' perceived safety on intersections and roundabouts - A qualitative bicycle simulator study

Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling

Cycling and disability: A call for further research

Network planning and infrastructure design

A multi-city study on structural characteristics of bicycle networks

Where and how Tucsonans ride and implications for cycling infrastructure

Designing bike-friendly cities: Interactive effects of built environment factors on bike-sharing