Abstract:The DIN 92419 defines six principles for assistive systems' ergonomic design. There is, however, a lack of measurement tools to evaluate assistive systems considering these principles. Consequently, this study developed a measurement tool for the quantitative evaluation of the fulfilment of each principle for assistive systems. A systematic literature review was performed to identify dimensions belonging to the principles, identify how previous research evaluated these dimensions, and develop a measurement tool for assistive systems. Findings show that scales commonly used for evaluating assistive systems disregard several aspects highlighted as relevant by research, implying the need for considering the DIN 92419 principles. Based on established scales and theoretical findings, a questionnaire, and a checklist for evaluating assistive systems were developed. The work provides a grounding for measuring relevant aspects of assistive systems. Further development is needed to substantiate the reliability and validity of the proposed questionnaire scales and items. Practitioner Summary: Responding to the gap of a holistic measurement tool to evaluate assistive systems, a systematic literature review was performed considering the DIN 92419 principles. This resulted in a comprehensive summary of relevant aspects of assistive systems that were made numerically measurable, which proposes better criteria to assess assistive systems. Abbreviations: IoT: internet of things; RQ: research question; TAM: technology acceptance model; UTAUT: unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; AaaS: adaptivity as a service; SAR: socially assistive robots; SEEV: salience, effort, expectancy, and value; PRISMA: preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses; HMI: human-machine interaction; HRI: human-robot interaction; BCI: brain-computer interface; QUEST: Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology; SUS: system usability scale; NASA-TLX: NASA task load index; ATD PA: assistive technology device predisposition assessment; Wheel Con: wheelchair use confidence scale; CATOM: caregiver assistive technology outcome measure; CBI: caregiver burden inventory; RoSAS: robotic social attributes scale; WheelCon: wheelchair use confidence scale; IMI: intrinsic motivation inventory; ATD PA: assistive technology device predisposition assessment; UEQ: User experience questionnaire; USEUQ: usefulness satisfaction and ease of use questionnaire; USPW: usability scale for power wheelchairs; UES: user engagement scale; SUTAQ: service user technology acceptability questionnaire; QUEAD: questionnaire for the evaluation of physical assistive devices; FATCAT: functional assessment tool for cognitive assistive technology; SE-HRI: human-robot interaction scale; SART: situation awareness rating technique; TSQ;WT: tele-healthcare satisfaction questionnaire-wearable technology; PAIF: participants' assessment of the intervention's feasibility; SWAT: subjective workload assessment technique; MARS-HA: measure of audiologic rehabilitation self-efficacy for hearing aids; IOI-HA: International outcome inventory for hearing aids; FMA: functional mobility assessment; FBIS: familiarity and behavioural intention survey; CSQ: client satisfaction questionnaire; COPM: canadian occupational performance measure; ATCS: assistive technology confidence scale; ACC: acceptance; SSP: safety, security and privacy; OPT: optimisation of resultant internal load; CTRL: controllability; ADAPT: adaptability; P&I: perceptibility and identifiability; AAL: ambient assisted living; VR: virtual reality; AS: assistive system; WEIRD: Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic; HEART: horizontal european activities of rehabilitation technology; AAATE: advancement of assistive technology in Europe's; GATE: global collaboration on assistive technology; ATA-C: assistive technology assessment toolkit.

Protocol for identifying and characterising critical physical tasks in the military: Development and validation

Characterising the physical demands of critical tasks across the Royal Australian Air Force

A physical demands analysis to identify and delineate critical physical tasks for physically demanding US air force occupations

A job task analysis of the authorised firearms officer –counter terrorism (AFO-CT) national role profile

Revalidating U.S. Army soldiers' perceptions of combat arms job tasks: Frequencies, importance and expectations of performance

An observational objective job analysis of role related tasks undertaken by Royal Navy sailors

A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards

Determining cut-off scores for simulated tasks in Brazilian Air Force military personnel

Why are we doing this Staff? Justification and implications of aerobic fitness testing in the military

Development of an evidence-based swimming representative military task to assess swimming competency in the British Army

Monitoring work and training load in military settings – what’s in the toolbox?

Development and validation of a task load index for process control room operators (PCRO-TLX)

Measuring Physical Function in the PICU: Development and Testing of a Children's Version (Age 2–18 yr) of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool

Development of a metric to evaluate the ergonomic principles of assistive systems, based on the DIN 92419

Reliability of a Musculoskeletal Assessment for the Examination of Cervical Spine Pain and Injuries in Special Forces Combat Soldiers

A standardized validity assessment protocol for physiological signals from wearable technology: Methodological underpinnings and an application to the E4 biosensor

Consensus paper on testing and evaluation of military exoskeletons for the dismounted combatant

A study of well-being among a population of Swedish workers using a job-related criterion-referenced multidimensional vocational assessment

Evaluation of the implementation and effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention strategy for safe patient handling and movement in the healthcare sector: a study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial

The identification of combat survivability tasks associated with naval vessel damage in maritime environments

Content Validity Testing of a Novel Cognitive Screen, the Gaylord Occupational Therapy Cognitive (GOT–Cog), to Improve Inpatient Occupational Therapy Treatment Planning