Adherence to quality indicators for emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to patient sex

Pere Llorens,Álvaro Lirón-García,Miriam Santos-Redondo,Juan Marín-Aparicio,Begoña Espinosa,Elena Martínez,Pablo Chico-Sánchez,Rosario Sánchez,José-Manuel Ramos-Rincón,Pablo Chico
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55633/s3me/028.2024
2024-01-17
Emergencias
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: To study differences in the emergency department treatment of acute poisoning according to biological sex of patients and to assess adherence to care quality indicators.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study including all cases of acute poisoning diagnosed in patients over the age of 14 years treated in a tertiary care hospital emergency department over a period of 4 years. We analyzed demographic variables, substance type and reason for acute poisoning, degree of adherence to quality indicators, and discharge destination.RESULTS: A total of 1144 cases were included; 710 patients (62.1%) were female and 434 (37.9%) were male. The proportion of deliberate self-poisoning was higher in females (52.3% vs 41.4% in males; P .001); unintentional poisoning was less frequent in females (in 24.9% vs in 30.3% of males; P = .047). Benzodiazepine poisoning was more frequent in females (in 49.6% vs 41.2%; P = .007). Street drug and alcohol poisoning was less common in females. Adherence to quality indicators was high (> 85%) for both sexes.CONCLUSION: The epidemiologic profile of poisoning is different in females and males. General emergency department adherence to quality indicators can be considered optimal. We detected no qualitative sex-related differences in the care of patients with acute poisoning.
emergency medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?