Leveraging spatial uncertainty for online error compensation in EMT

Henry Krumb,Sofie Hofmann,David Kügler,Ahmed Ghazy,Bernhard Dorweiler,Judith Bredemann,Robert Schmitt,Georgios Sakas,Anirban Mukhopadhyay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02189-w
2020-05-22
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Abstract:Abstract Purpose Electromagnetic tracking (EMT) can potentially complement fluoroscopic navigation, reducing radiation exposure in a hybrid setting. Due to the susceptibility to external distortions, systematic error in EMT needs to be compensated algorithmically. Compensation algorithms for EMT in guidewire procedures are only practical in an online setting. Methods We collect positional data and train a symmetric artificial neural network (ANN) architecture for compensating navigation error. The results are evaluated in both online and offline scenarios and are compared to polynomial fits. We assess spatial uncertainty of the compensation proposed by the ANN. Simulations based on real data show how this uncertainty measure can be utilized to improve accuracy and limit radiation exposure in hybrid navigation. Results ANNs compensate unseen distortions by more than 70%, outperforming polynomial regression. Working on known distortions, ANNs outperform polynomials as well. We empirically demonstrate a linear relationship between tracking accuracy and model uncertainty. The effectiveness of hybrid tracking is shown in a simulation experiment. Conclusion ANNs are suitable for EMT error compensation and can generalize across unseen distortions. Model uncertainty needs to be assessed when spatial error compensation algorithms are developed, so that training data collection can be optimized. Finally, we find that error compensation in EMT reduces the need for X-ray images in hybrid navigation.
engineering, biomedical,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?