Abstract:Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, as a freeform biomedical manufacturing approach, has been increasingly adopted for the fabrication of constructs analogous to living tissues. Generally, materials printed during 3D bioprinting are referred as bioinks, which may include living cells, extracellular matrix materials, cell media, and/or other additives. For 3D bioprinting to be an enabling tissue engineering approach, the bioink printability is a critical requirement as tissue constructs must be able to be printed and reproduce the complex micro-architecture of native tissues in vitro in sufficient resolution. The bioink printability is generally characterized in terms of the controllable formation of well-defined droplets/jets/filaments and/or the morphology and shape fidelity of deposited building blocks. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the studies of bioink printability during representative 3D bioprinting processes, including inkjet printing, laser printing, and micro-extrusion, with a focus on the understanding of the underlying physics during the formation of bioink-based features. A detailed discussion is conducted based on the typical time scales and dimensionless quantities for printability evaluation during bioprinting. For inkjet printing, the Z (the inverse of the Ohnesorge number), Weber, and capillary numbers have been employed for the construction of phase diagrams during the printing of Newtonian fluids, while the Weissenberg and Deborah numbers have been utilized during the printing of non-Newtonian bioinks. During laser printing of Newtonian solutions, the jettability can be characterized using the inverse of the Ohnesorge number, while Ohnesorge, elasto-capillary, and Weber numbers have been utilized to construct phase diagrams for typical non-Newtonian bioinks. For micro-extrusion, seven filament types have been identified including three types of well-defined filaments and four types of irregular filaments. During micro-extrusion, the Oldroyd number has been used to characterize the dimensions of the yielded areas of Herschel-Bulkley fluids. Non-ideal jetting behaviors are common during the droplet-based inkjet and laser printing processes due to the local nonuniformity and nonhomogeneity of cell-laden bioinks.

Improving Thermosensitive Bioink Scaffold Fabrication with a Temperature-Regulated Printhead in Robot-Assisted In Situ Bioprinting System

Thermo-sensitive Sacrificial Microsphere-based Bioink for Centimeter-scale Tissue with Angiogenesis

A Systematic Thermal Analysis for Accurately Predicting the Extrusion Printability of Alginate-Gelatin-Based Hydrogel Bioinks

Sacrificial Microgel-Laden Bioink-Enabled 3D Bioprinting of Mesoscale Pore Networks

3D Bioprinting of Low-Concentration Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacrylate (gelma) Bioinks with a Two-Step Cross-linking Strategy.

Freeform laser and inkjet printing of biological constructs

Modeling the Printability of Photocuring and Strength Adjustable Hydrogel Bioink During Projection-Based 3D Bioprinting.

Evaluation of Bioink Printability for Bioprinting Applications

In Situ 3D-Printing using a Bio-ink of Protein–photosensitizer Conjugates for Single-cell Manipulation

An Adhesive Bioink toward Biofabrication under Wet Conditions

Decellularized matrix bioink with gelatin methacrylate for simultaneous improvements in printability and biofunctionality

New Strategies for High Efficiency and Precision Bioprinting by DOE Technology and Machine Learning

Stepwise Multi-Cross-Linking Bioink for 3D Embedded Bioprinting to Promote Full-Thickness Wound Healing

Reversible physical crosslinking strategy with optimal temperature for 3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacryloyl bioink

4D printing of biological macromolecules employing handheld bioprinters for in situ wound healing applications

Development of GelMA ink for multi-scale biological 3D printing

Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: bioprinting

The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology

In situ 3D bioprinting with bioconcrete bioink

3D Bioprinting of shear-thinning hybrid bioinks with excellent bioactivity derived from gellan/alginate and thixotropic magnesium phosphate-based gels

Robotic-assisted automated in situ bioprinting