OHCCPredictor: an Online Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Survival Duration of Older Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Juntao Tan,Yue Yu,Xiantian Lin,Yuxin He,Wen Jin,Hong Qian,Ying Li,Xiaomei Xu,Yuxi Zhao,Jianwen Ning,Zhengyu Zhang,Jingjing Chen,Xiaoxin Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-023-10516-x
IF: 9.029
2023-01-01
Hepatology International
Abstract:Background Although the elderly constitute more than a third of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, they have not been adequately represented in treatment and prognosis studies. Thus, there is not enough evidence to guide the treatment of such patients. The objective of this study is to identify the prognostic factors of older patients with HCC and to construct a new prognostic model for predicting their overall survival (OS). Methods 2,721 HCC patients aged ≥ 65 were extracted from the public database-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and randomly divided into a training set and an internal validation set with a ratio of 7:3. 101 patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were identified as the external validation set. Univariate cox regression analyses and multivariate cox regression analyses were adopted to identify these independent prognostic factors. A predictive nomogram-based risk stratification model was proposed and evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and a decision curve analysis (DCA). Results These attributes including age, sex, marital status, T stage, N stage, surgery, chemotherapy, tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein level, fibrosis score, bone metastasis, lung metastasis, and grade were the independent prognostic factors for older patients with HCC while predicting survival duration. We found that the nomogram provided a good assessment of OS at 1, 3, and 5 years in older patients with HCC (1-year OS: (training set: AUC = 0.823 (95%CI 0.803–0.845); internal validation set: AUC = 0.847 (95%CI 0.818–0.876); external validation set: AUC = 0.732 (95%CI 0.521–0.943)); 3-year OS: (training set: AUC = 0.813 (95%CI 0.790–0.837); internal validation set: AUC = 0.844 (95%CI 0.812–0.876); external validation set: AUC = 0.780 (95%CI 0.674–0.887)); 5-year OS: (training set: AUC = 0.839 (95%CI 0.806–0.872); internal validation set: AUC = 0.800 (95%CI 0.751–0.849); external validation set: AUC = 0.821 (95%CI 0.727–0.914)). The calibration curves showed that the nomogram was with strong calibration. The DCA indicated that the nomogram can be used as an effective tool in clinical practice. The risk stratification of all subgroups was statistically significant ( p < 0.05). In the stratification analysis of surgery, larger resection (LR) achieved a better survival curve than local destruction (LD), but a worse one than segmental resection (SR) and liver transplantation (LT) ( p < 0.0001). With the consideration of the friendship to clinicians, we further developed an online interface (OHCCPredictor) for such a predictive function ( https://juntaotan.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp_hcc/ ). With such an easily obtained online tool, clinicians will be provided helpful assistance in formulating personalized therapy to assess the prognosis of older patients with HCC. Conclusions Age, sex, marital status, T stage, N stage, surgery, chemotherapy, tumor size, AFP level, fibrosis score, bone metastasis, lung metastasis, and grade were independent prognostic factors for elderly patients with HCC. The constructed nomogram model based on the above factors could accurately predict the prognosis of such patients. Besides, the developed online web interface of the predictive model provide easily obtained access for clinicians.