Abstract:Abstract How humans connect with nature impacts the well‐being of both people and ecosystems. Being disconnected from nature can lead to attitudes and behaviours that ultimately damage our physical and mental health and cause irreparable harm to the planet. To measure the human‐nature connection, measurements with good psychometric properties are warranted. By synthesizing the existing instruments, we suggested the distinctive advantages of the Extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale (EINS), such as using multiple graphical spatial metaphors. Based on the back‐translation method, we translated the EINS into a Chinese version (EINS‐C). Then, using the Rasch model and the classical test theory, we elaborately examined the psychometric properties of the scale with a sample of 786 Chinese adults. Exploratory factor analysis, principal components analysis of Rasch residuals, and confirmative factor analysis together provided robust evidence for the one‐factor structure of the EINS‐C. Category probability curves showed the satisfying functioning of the rating scale. The scale further exhibited high criterion validity, convergent validity, internal consistency and test–retest reliability. The Rasch model fit statistics were also substantial for items. Each item presented a moderate difficulty, suggesting high discrimination power for levels of self‐nature connection. Scores on the scale could be meaningfully compared across genders, as no substantial differential item functioning was found. The EINS‐C consequently demonstrated generally robust psychometric properties, which could be applied to the Chinese‐speaking community, approximately 16 per cent of the world's population. This high‐quality and convenient tool for evaluating and monitoring the relationship between humans and nature lays a foundation for and might facilitate conservation‐related research and policy formulation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

An Analysis of the Predictive Validity of the New Ecological Paradigm Scale

New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale

The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis

Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm

The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use

The new ecological paradigm revisited: anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics

The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Has It Outlived Its Usefulness?

An empirical test of anchoring the NEP scale in environmental ethics

Theoretical Exploration of the New Environmental Paradigm Scale in China

The new environmental paradigm scale: Reassessing the operationalization of contemporary environmentalism

Measuring Environmental Perceptions Grounded on Different Theoretical Models: The 2-Major Environmental Values (2-MEV) Model in Comparison with the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale

Are environmental attitudes influenced by survey context? An investigation of the context dependency of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale

Psychometric Evaluation of the Extended Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale in Chinese Adults Through the Rasch Analysis

The NEP scale: measuring ecological attitudes/worldviews in an African context

Exploring the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale in India: Item Analysis, Factor Structure and Refinement

Ecological Worldview as the Central Component of Environmental Concern: Clarifying the Role of the NEP

Validating the Scale of the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) in Brazilian University Students

The New Ecological Paradigm scale from the perspective of the pre-service primary and preschool teachers' ecological narratives

Development and psychometric validation of a brief scale to measure environmental perception based on the 2-major environmental values model in adolescents and adults