Testing of the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework at acute healthcare facility level

S. Tomczyk,S. Aghdassi,J. Storr,S. Hansen,A.J. Stewardson,P. Bischoff,P. Gastmeier,B. Allegranzi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.016
IF: 8.944
2020-05-01
Journal of Hospital Infection
Abstract:<h2 class="section-title u-h3 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Structured summary</h2><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Monitoring and evaluation are an essential part of infection prevention and control (IPC) implementation. We developed an IPC assessment framework (IPACF) to support the <em>World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines on IPC Core Components</em> implementation in acute health care facilities.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Aim</h3><p>We aimed to evaluate the usability and reliability of the IPCAF tool for global use.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>The IPCAF is a questionnaire with a scoring system to measure the level of IPC implementation according to the eight WHO core components. The tool was qualitatively pre-tested, revised and selectively translated. A convenience sample of hospitals was invited to participate in the final testing. At least two IPC professionals from each hospital independently completed the IPCAF and a usability questionnaire online. The tool's internal consistency and inter-observer reliability or intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were assessed and usability questions were descriptively summarised.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Findings</h3><p>A total of 46 countries, 181 hospitals, and 324 individuals participated; 52 (16%) and 55 (17%) individual respondents came from low- and lower-middle income countries, respectively. 52% took less than one hour to complete the IPCAF. Overall, we found adequate internal consistency and a high ICC (0.92 [95% CI: 0.89-0.94]). Ten individual questions had poor reliability (ICCs &lt; 0.4), which were considered for revision according to usability feedback and expert opinion.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>The WHO IPCAF was tested using a robust global study. We believe this enables it to be a more effective tool for IPC improvement in health care facilities.</p>
infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?