Abstract:Highly automated vehicles (HAVs) will interact with pedestrians in urban environments. This requires efficient communication tools to ensure mutual understanding. Past research showed that pedestrians mostly used vehicle kinematics to communicate with vehicles, e.g., the vehicle's speed and distance. However, pedestrians required further explicit communication signals when the traffic situation was ambiguous. Light-band external human–machine interfaces (eHMIs) transmit additional explicit communication signals to pedestrians, e.g., the vehicle's yielding intent. To this point, the precise interplay of vehicle kinematics and eHMIs for HAVs has not yet been determined. Nevertheless, previous research showed that combining both means of communication has great potential to increase pedestrian perceived safety and to ensure a safe interaction. Only a little research used real vehicle studies to investigate the interaction between pedestrians and HAVs in a close-to-reality experimental setting. However, this would ensure the transferability of experimental results to future urban traffic. Therefore, this study aimed to address this research gap by investigating the effects of vehicle kinematics, eHMIs, and their interplay in a real-world pedestrian crossing on pedestrians' behaviors and subjective evaluations. In this field experiment, we applied a light-band eHMI on a Wizard-of-Oz test vehicle, an actual vehicle instructed as an HAV. We investigated the effects of vehicle kinematics (early yielding vs. late yielding) and the eHMI status (no eHMI, static eHMI, dynamic eHMI) on pedestrians' crossing behavior and subjective evaluation in a low-speed real-world setting. The static eHMI displayed the vehicle automation status by a static illuminated eHMI. The dynamic eHMI conveyed the automation status and the vehicle's yielding intent. This study focused particularly on the interplay of vehicle kinematics and eHMI status. We assumed that the crossing initiation was shorter when a dynamic eHMI was combined with an early yielding compared to a late yielding in this real-world setting. Moreover, we hypothesized that pedestrians' subjective evaluations are more positive for a well-coordinated interplay of eHMI and vehicle kinematics. The results showed that pedestrians initiated their crossing earlier with dynamic eHMI vs. no eHMI or static eHMI. Furthermore, they perceived a dynamic eHMI as safer and more trustworthy compared to no eHMI or a static eHMI. Combining an early yielding and dynamic eHMI increased participants' perceived safety of the vehicle behavior and trust and improved pedestrians' affective evaluations compared to a late yielding with dynamic eHMI. Overall, this real vehicle study highlighted the importance of implicit and explicit communication signals and their well-coordinated interplay for pedestrians' future interactions with HAVs in a real-world setting.

Autonomy bias: A deception experiment to isolate the effect of vehicle automation on perceptions of pedestrian comfort & safety

Forecasting the Evolution of Urban Mobility: the Influence of Anthropomorphism and Social Responsiveness in the Transition from Human to Automated Driving

Intelligent Mobility in the City: The Influence of System and Context Factors on Drivers’ Takeover Willingness and Trust in Automated Vehicles

Risk Assessment by a Passenger of an Autonomous Vehicle Among Pedestrians: Relationship Between Subjective and Physiological Measures

Using a Configurational Approach to Examine the Impacts of Vehicle Appearance Perception on Pedestrian Acceptance of the External Human-Machine Interfaces on Autonomous Vehicles

Crossing roads in a social context: How behaviors of others shape pedestrian interaction with automated vehicles

How should human-driven and autonomous vehicles behave at a zebra crossing? Determining acceptable stopping distances and setting-off times

How Do Pedestrians' Perception Change toward Autonomous Vehicles during Unmarked Midblock Multilane Crossings: Role of AV Operation and Signal Indication

Pedestrian and Passenger Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles: Field Study in a Crosswalk Scenario

Vehicle Automation Field Test: Impact on Driver Behavior and Trust

Deviant Behavior of Pedestrians: A Risk Gamble or Just Against Automated Vehicles? How About Social Control?

Hello, is it me you're Stopping for? The Effect of external Human Machine Interface Familiarity on Pedestrians' Crossing Behaviour in an Ambiguous Situation

Pedestrian-Vehicle Interaction in Shared Space: Insights for Autonomous Vehicles

An Empirical Investigation on the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: Perspective of Drivers' Self–AV Bias

Behavioural gap assessment of human-vehicle interaction in real and virtual reality-based scenarios in autonomous driving

Pedestrians' responses to scalable automated vehicles with different external human-machine interfaces: Evidence from a video-based eye-tracking experiment

Subjective risk and associated electrodermal activity of a self-driving car passenger in an urban shared space

From Visions to Reality: Investigating the Interplay of Vehicle Kinematics and Light-band eHMI in a Real Vehicle Study

Human-vehicle interaction for autonomous vehicles in crosswalk scenarios: Field experiments with pedestrians and passengers

Comparing implicit communication via longitudinal driving dynamics: A cross-cultural study in Germany and the UK

Cross-cultural analysis of pedestrian group behaviour influence on crossing decisions in interactions with autonomous vehicles